Appropriateness of Otic Quinolone Use among Privately Insured US Patients.

OBJECTIVE

Considering emerging safety concerns involving otic quinolones, we assessed the extent of otic quinolone use for questionable indications.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional study of a national sample of privately insured patients.

SETTING

Outpatient encounters in the United States.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Children and adults with outpatient pharmacy-dispensing claims for new prescriptions of otic or ophthalmic quinolones in 2017 were identified within the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters and the Medicare Supplemental Database. Each dispensing ≥30 days apart constituted a unique episode. Only claims with supporting ear-related diagnoses on outpatient encounters ±3 days of dispensing were considered. Ophthalmic drops were excluded if eye-related diagnoses were found ±30 days. Prescribing was classified as appropriate, questionable, or undetermined.

RESULTS

We found 214,897 episodes in 200,270 patients. Adults were twice as likely as children to have otic treatment with questionable indications (6.2% vs 3.0%). Sensitivity analyses with broader time windows to ascertain diagnoses showed similar proportions of questionable use. Otalgia and cerumen impaction constituted 90% of questionable indications. Family physicians (6.8%) and internists (8.0%) had higher percentages of questionable use than other specialties.

CONCLUSION

Based on the demonstrated risks of quinolone ear drops, opportunities exist to decrease otic quinolone use, especially in adults.