• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相对于蔗糖,成年家蝇(双翅目:蝇科)对选择的单糖、糖醇和人工甜味剂的摄食反应。

Feeding Response to Select Monosaccharides, Sugar Alcohols, and Artificial Sweeteners Relative to Sucrose in Adult House Flies, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae).

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.

出版信息

J Med Entomol. 2020 Feb 27;57(2):511-518. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjz195.

DOI:10.1093/jme/tjz195
PMID:31743395
Abstract

Use of insecticidal baits risks the evolution of resistance to the feeding stimulant in the bait, not just to the active ingredient (toxicant). Sucrose-based baits are widely used against house flies, Musca domestica L. The baits are applied as dry granules, but readily liquefy. The proboscis extension reflex (PER) and consumption of alternative sweeteners, dry or in solution, were examined. Fructose, glucose, and xylitol merit further study as alternatives to sucrose. Dry, fructose, glucose, and xylitol elicited PER much more than sucrose, although not when in solution. Furthermore, dry or in solution, females and males ate as much or more fructose as sucrose. In solution, flies ate as much glucose as sucrose; although when dry, consumption was much less for glucose than sucrose. Dry, xylitol elicited as much consumption as sucrose for females, though less for males. In solution, for both sexes, xylitol elicited less consumption than sucrose did. Acesulfame potassium, sodium cyclamate, and sucralose do not look promising as they did not often elicit PER, whether dry or in solution. Erythritol also does not look promising. Erythritol elicited PER no more than sucrose did when dry and elicited PER much less than sucrose when in solution. Flies ate much less erythritol than sucrose whether dry or in solution.

摘要

使用杀虫诱饵会增加诱饵中摄食刺激物对杀虫剂产生抗药性的风险,而不仅仅是对活性成分(有毒物质)产生抗药性。基于蔗糖的诱饵被广泛用于防治家蝇(Musca domestica L.)。诱饵以干燥颗粒形式使用,但很容易液化。研究了触角延伸反射(PER)和替代甜味剂的消耗,无论是干燥的还是在溶液中的。果糖、葡萄糖和木糖醇作为蔗糖的替代品值得进一步研究。与蔗糖相比,干燥的、果糖、葡萄糖和木糖醇更能引发 PER,但在溶液中则不然。此外,无论是干燥的还是在溶液中,雌性和雄性摄入的果糖和蔗糖一样多或更多。在溶液中,苍蝇摄入的葡萄糖与蔗糖一样多;尽管当干燥时,葡萄糖的消耗比蔗糖少得多。干燥时,木糖醇对雌性的消耗与蔗糖一样多,但对雄性的消耗则较少。在溶液中,无论是雌性还是雄性,木糖醇的消耗都比蔗糖少。乙酰磺胺酸钾、环己基氨基磺酸钠和三氯蔗糖看起来不太有希望,因为它们无论是干燥的还是在溶液中,都很少引发 PER。赤藓糖醇也不太有希望。赤藓糖醇无论是干燥的还是在溶液中,引发的 PER 都不比蔗糖多,而在溶液中,引发的 PER 比蔗糖少得多。无论是干燥的还是在溶液中,苍蝇摄入的赤藓糖醇都比蔗糖少。

相似文献

1
Feeding Response to Select Monosaccharides, Sugar Alcohols, and Artificial Sweeteners Relative to Sucrose in Adult House Flies, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae).相对于蔗糖,成年家蝇(双翅目:蝇科)对选择的单糖、糖醇和人工甜味剂的摄食反应。
J Med Entomol. 2020 Feb 27;57(2):511-518. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjz195.
2
Insecticidal Potential of Two Sugar Alcohols to Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae).两种糖醇对家蝇(双翅目:蝇科)的杀虫潜力
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Oct 1;110(5):2252-2258. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox190.
3
Mortality of the House Fly (Diptera: Muscidae) After Exposure to Combinations of Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) With the Polyol Sweeteners Erythritol and Xylitol.家蝇(双翅目:蝇科)暴露于球孢白僵菌(肉座菌目:麦角菌科)与多元醇甜味剂赤藓糖醇和木糖醇组合后的死亡率
J Med Entomol. 2018 Aug 29;55(5):1237-1244. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjy083.
4
Survival of the House Fly (Diptera: Muscidae) on Truvia and Other Sweeteners.家蝇(双翅目:蝇科)在纯甜菊糖苷及其他甜味剂上的存活情况
J Med Entomol. 2017 Jul 1;54(4):999-1005. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjw241.
5
Larvicidal potential of the polyol sweeteners erythritol and xylitol in two filth fly species.多元醇甜味剂赤藓糖醇和木糖醇对两种腐蝇的杀幼虫潜力
J Vector Ecol. 2019 Jun;44(1):11-17. doi: 10.1111/jvec.12324.
6
Concentration Dependent Feeding on Imidacloprid by Behaviorally Resistant House Flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae).行为抗性家蝇(双翅目:蝇科)对吡虫啉的浓度依赖取食行为。
J Med Entomol. 2022 Nov 16;59(6):2066-2071. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjac130.
7
Mortality Rate of House Flies (Diptera: Muscidae) Exposed to Insecticidal Granular Fly Baits Containing Indoxacarb, Dinotefuran, or Cyantraniliprole.接触含茚虫威、呋虫胺或虫螨腈的杀虫颗粒蝇诱饵的家蝇死亡率。
J Econ Entomol. 2019 Sep 23;112(5):2474-2481. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz170.
8
Sex-specific Feeding Behavior of Adult House Flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae).家蝇(Musca domestica L.,双翅目:蝇科)成虫的性别特异性取食行为
J Med Entomol. 2023 Jan 12;60(1):7-13. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjac161.
9
House fly (Diptera: Muscidae) activity near baits containing (Z)-9-tricosene and efficacy of commercial toxic fly baits on a southern California dairy.家蝇(双翅目:蝇科)在含有(Z)-9-二十三碳烯的诱饵附近的活动以及商业有毒蝇饵对南加州一家奶牛场的效果。
J Econ Entomol. 2007 Aug;100(4):1489-95. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[1489:hfdman]2.0.co;2.
10
Behavioral resistance of house flies, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) to imidacloprid.家蝇(双翅目:蝇科)对吡虫啉的行为抗性
US Army Med Dep J. 2009 Jul-Sep:54-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Strain variation in feeding response of house flies, Musca domestica, to denatonium benzoate, a bittering agent used in commercial fly baits.家蝇(Musca domestica)对苯甲酸地那铵(一种用于商业蝇饵的苦味剂)摄食反应的品系变异。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326572. eCollection 2025.
2
Botanical Antifeedants: An Alternative Approach to Pest Control.植物性拒食剂:害虫防治的一种替代方法。
Insects. 2025 Jan 31;16(2):136. doi: 10.3390/insects16020136.
3
Behavioral response of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) to 3 bittering agents.
家蝇(双翅目:蝇科)对三种苦味剂的行为反应。
J Insect Sci. 2025 Jan 20;25(1). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieae117.
4
High-sugar diet leads to loss of beneficial probiotics in housefly larvae guts.高糖饮食导致家蝇幼虫肠道内有益益生菌的丧失。
ISME J. 2024 Jan 8;18(1). doi: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae193.
5
Gustation in insects: taste qualities and types of evidence used to show taste function of specific body parts.昆虫的味觉:用于证明特定身体部位味觉功能的味觉质量和证据类型。
J Insect Sci. 2023 Mar 1;23(2). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iead018.
6
Risk assessment of resistance to diflubenzuron in Musca domestica: Realized heritability and cross-resistance to fourteen insecticides from different classes.家蝇对除虫脲抗性的风险评估:实际遗传力及对十四种不同类别杀虫剂的交互抗性
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0268261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268261. eCollection 2022.