Zhang Y, Li X M, Jiang H, Ge H Y, Liu H J, Li M T
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Heart Center, First Hospital of Tsinghua University (Beijing Huaxin Hospital), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016,China.
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Nov 24;47(11):901-906. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.11.009.
To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors after catheter ablation of accessory pathway (AP)-induced dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in children. Data were collected and analyzed on 147 consecutive pediatric patients (81males and 66 females), who hospitalized in our pediatric heart center between January 2009 and August 2018 and received catheter ablation for ventricular pre-excitation (right AP). Thirty-one children were diagnosed as AP-induced DCM and 116 children with normal cardiac function served as control. Data including clinical characteristics, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, electrophysiological examination (EPS), successful ablation and follow up were analyzed. The median age at first examination was 3.07 (0.09, 5.83) years. The pre-hospital misdiagnosis rate was 87.1% (27/31). The incidence of the AP-induced DCM was 21.1% (31/147) and the rate of right anterior free wall accessory pathway (AP) was the highest (50.0%, 10/20). AP-induced DCM was more common in right free wall Aps (41.9%, 13/31) and right anterior free wall (32.3%, 10/31). 48.4% (15/31) cases had no supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). EPS showed that 29% (9/31) of the AP did not have retrograde conduction. The median follow-up time after successful catheter ablation was 8 (2, 36) months of AP-induced DCM group, LVDd was significantly decreased ((41.6±12.8)mm vs. (45.6±13.9)mm, 0.01) and LVEF ((56.2±11.8)% vs. (40.8±12.5)%, 0.01) was significantly increased after ablation. Cox regression analysis showed that LVEF was the predictor of the duration of cardiac function recovery (=1.08, 95 1.01-1.15, 0.03). Misdiagnosis rate is high for children with AP-induced DCM, leading to the delayed treatment. All of the AP-induced DCM occurred in right APs and right anterior free wall APs is the highest. Right free wall APs and right anterior free wall are most common in AP-induced DCM. Catheter ablation is a safe and effective treatment option for these patients. The lower the LVEF, the longer the cardiac function recovery.
探讨小儿房室旁道(AP)介导的扩张型心肌病(DCM)导管消融术后的临床特征及预后因素。收集并分析了2009年1月至2018年8月在我院小儿心脏中心住院并接受室性预激(右AP)导管消融的147例连续儿科患者(男81例,女66例)的数据。31例儿童被诊断为AP介导的DCM,116例心功能正常的儿童作为对照。分析了包括临床特征、心电图(ECG)、超声心动图、电生理检查(EPS)、成功消融及随访等数据。首次检查的中位年龄为3.07(0.09,5.83)岁。院前误诊率为87.1%(27/31)。AP介导的DCM发病率为21.1%(31/147),右前游离壁旁道(AP)发生率最高(50.0%,10/20)。AP介导的DCM在右游离壁APs中更常见(41.9%,13/31),在右前游离壁中也较常见(32.3%,10/31)。48.4%(15/31)的病例无室上性心动过速(SVT)。EPS显示29%(9/31)的AP无逆向传导。AP介导的DCM组成功导管消融后的中位随访时间为8(2,36)个月,消融后左室舒张末内径(LVDd)显著降低((41.6±12.8)mm对(45.6±13.9)mm,P=0.01),左室射血分数(LVEF)显著升高((56.2±11.8)%对(40.8±12.5)%,P=0.01)。Cox回归分析显示LVEF是心功能恢复持续时间的预测因子(β=1.08,95%CI 1.01 - 1.15,P=0.03)。AP介导的DCM患儿误诊率高,导致治疗延迟。所有AP介导的DCM均发生在右APs,其中右前游离壁APs最高。右游离壁APs和右前游离壁在AP介导的DCM中最常见。导管消融是这些患者安全有效的治疗选择。LVEF越低,心功能恢复所需时间越长。