Suppr超能文献

从 LHT 角度解释历史变化:需要一个多元因果框架。

Explaining historical change in terms of LHT: A pluralistic causal framework is needed.

机构信息

Laboratory of Political Theory, University of Paris 8, 93526 Saint Denis,

Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity; Paris Descartes University, 75004 Paris,

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Nov 20;42:e190. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19000219.

Abstract

Baumard suggests that the advent, through phenotypic plasticity mechanisms, of future-oriented preferences and creative mindsets in eighteenth-century Great Britain explains the wave of innovations that drove the British Industrial Revolution. We argue that, although this approach is promising, Baumard's model would benefit from being supplemented by demographic, economic, and sociological explanations independent of Life History Theory (LHT).

摘要

鲍马德认为,通过表型可塑性机制,未来导向的偏好和创造性思维在 18 世纪的英国出现,这解释了推动英国工业革命的创新浪潮。我们认为,尽管这种方法很有前途,但鲍马德的模型如果能得到人口统计学、经济学和社会学的解释,而不依赖于生命史理论(LHT),将会受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验