• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与神经生理、临床和社会心理功能相关的精神分裂症的核心认知特征是认知能力的偏离预期。

Deviation from expected cognitive ability is a core cognitive feature of schizophrenia related to neurophysiologic, clinical and psychosocial functioning.

机构信息

VISN-22 Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:300-307. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.011
PMID:31744751
Abstract

Cognitive functioning in schizophrenia is characterized by a generalized impairment in current cognitive ability based on traditional population-based norms. However, these norms assume a normal cognitive trajectory and do not directly account for illness-related declines from expected cognitive potential. Indeed, schizophrenia patients exhibit even greater deviation between their observed and expected cognitive functioning based on expanded norms that leverage premorbid variables resistant to illness-related features. The current study further quantified the extent to which illness-related features account for this deviation from expectation and assessed its relationship to neurophysiologic (mismatch negativity, P3a, theta oscillations), clinical, and psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia patients. Expected cognitive ability (PENN-CNB global cognition) in patients (n = 684) was calculated using healthy comparison subject (n = 660) weighted regression based on premorbid variables resistant to illness-related decline (demographics, single-word reading, parental education). The magnitude of any deviation between current (observed) and regression-predicted (expected) cognitive ability was calculated. Results indicated that 24% (n = 164) of the total patient population exhibited significant (≥-1.96 SD) deviation between observed and expected global cognitive ability. Interestingly, 20% of the total patient population (n = 136) had "normal" range cognitive performance when using traditional population-based norms, but also had significant deviation from expected cognitive ability. The magnitude of this deviation was associated with more severe neurophysiologic abnormalities, longer illness duration, higher levels of negative symptoms, and worse psychosocial functioning. Assessment of cognitive deviation is thus a complementary metric for characterizing the severity of illness-related cognitive declines in patients, while also reflecting the expression and severity of key endophenotypes of schizophrenia.

摘要

精神分裂症患者的认知功能表现为基于传统人群基准的当前认知能力普遍受损。然而,这些基准假设了一个正常的认知轨迹,并没有直接考虑到与疾病相关的认知潜力下降。事实上,精神分裂症患者根据利用抗疾病相关特征的前期变量的扩展基准,表现出更大的观察到的认知功能与预期认知功能之间的偏差。本研究进一步量化了与疾病相关的特征对这种预期偏差的程度,并评估了其与精神分裂症患者的神经生理(失匹配负波、P3a、θ 振荡)、临床和心理社会功能的关系。使用基于前期变量抗疾病下降(人口统计学、单个单词阅读、父母教育)的健康对照受试者(n=660)加权回归计算患者(n=684)的预期认知能力(PENN-CNB 总体认知)。计算当前(观察)和回归预测(预期)认知能力之间的任何偏差的程度。结果表明,24%(n=164)的患者群体表现出观察到的和回归预测的总体认知能力之间存在显著(≥-1.96 SD)偏差。有趣的是,20%的患者群体(n=136)在使用传统人群基准时具有“正常”范围的认知表现,但也存在显著的与预期认知能力的偏差。这种偏差的程度与更严重的神经生理异常、更长的疾病持续时间、更高水平的阴性症状和更差的心理社会功能有关。因此,评估认知偏差是一种补充指标,可以描述患者与疾病相关的认知衰退的严重程度,同时也反映了精神分裂症的关键内表型的表达和严重程度。

相似文献

1
Deviation from expected cognitive ability is a core cognitive feature of schizophrenia related to neurophysiologic, clinical and psychosocial functioning.与神经生理、临床和社会心理功能相关的精神分裂症的核心认知特征是认知能力的偏离预期。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:300-307. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
2
Oscillatory biomarkers of early auditory information processing predict cognitive gains following targeted cognitive training in schizophrenia patients.早期听觉信息处理的振荡生物标志物可预测精神分裂症患者进行针对性认知训练后的认知改善。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
Neurophysiologic measures of target engagement predict response to auditory-based cognitive training in treatment refractory schizophrenia.神经生理指标对目标的评估可预测对听觉认知训练的反应,听觉认知训练用于治疗难治性精神分裂症。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Feb;44(3):606-612. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0256-9. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
Mismatch negativity deficits are associated with poor functioning in schizophrenia patients.失匹配负波缺陷与精神分裂症患者的功能不良有关。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;62(2):127-36. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.2.127.
5
Decomposing the constituent oscillatory dynamics underlying mismatch negativity generation in schizophrenia: Distinct relationships to clinical and cognitive functioning.解析精神分裂症错配负波产生的组成振荡动力学:与临床和认知功能的不同关系。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Nov;145:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.12.014. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
6
Validation of mismatch negativity and P3a for use in multi-site studies of schizophrenia: characterization of demographic, clinical, cognitive, and functional correlates in COGS-2.用于精神分裂症多中心研究的失配负波和P3a的验证:COGS-2中人口统计学、临床、认知和功能相关性的特征分析
Schizophr Res. 2015 Apr;163(1-3):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.09.042. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
7
What does the Managing Emotions branch of the MSCEIT add to the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery?管理情绪分支的 ME 对 MATRICS 共识认知电池有何补充?
Schizophr Res. 2018 Jul;197:414-420. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
8
Lifetime psychopathological dimensions, cognitive impairment and functional outcome in psychosis.精神病的终生精神病理维度、认知障碍与功能结局
Schizophr Res. 2017 Jan;179:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
9
A comparative study of childhood/adolescent and adult onset schizophrenia: does the neurocognitive and psychosocial outcome differ?儿童/青少年期和成年期发病精神分裂症的比较研究:神经认知和社会心理结局是否不同?
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Jun;43:160-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Neuropsychological functioning in early and chronic stages of schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder.精神分裂症和精神病性双相情感障碍的早期和慢性阶段的神经心理学功能。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Apr;206:413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognition before and after psychosis onset: A naturalistic study of change, heterogeneity, and prognosis.精神病发作前后的认知:一项关于变化、异质性和预后的自然主义研究。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Aug 29;42:100387. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100387. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Cumulative Effect of Psychosis and Aging on Cognitive Function in Patients Diagnosed With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Cognitive Domain Approach.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者中精神病与衰老对认知功能的累积影响:一种认知领域方法
Cureus. 2024 Aug 12;16(8):e66733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66733. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Is source-resolved magnetoencephalographic mismatch negativity a viable biomarker for early psychosis?
源分辨脑磁图失匹配负波能否成为早期精神病的可行生物标志物?
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Apr;59(8):1889-1906. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16107. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
4
Impact of Cognitive Disturbances and Clinical Symptoms on Disability in Patients with Paranoid Schizophrenia: A Study of a Bulgarian Clinical Sample.认知障碍和临床症状对偏执型精神分裂症患者残疾的影响:一项保加利亚临床样本研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;20(3):2459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032459.
5
The effect of schizophrenia risk factors on mismatch responses in a rat model.精神分裂症风险因素对大鼠模型中失配响应的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Feb;60(2):e14175. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14175. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
6
European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.欧洲精神病学协会关于精神分裂症认知障碍评估的指南。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 5;65(1):e58. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2316.
7
Impairments in goal-directed action and reversal learning in a proportion of individuals with psychosis.在一部分精神病患者中,存在目标导向行为和反转学习的损伤。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Dec;22(6):1390-1403. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01026-8. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
8
Sources of the frontocentral mismatch negativity and P3a responses in schizophrenia patients and healthy comparison subjects.精神分裂症患者与健康对照者额区中央失匹配负波和 P3a 反应的来源。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Mar;161:76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 13.