Surgical Treatment of Ruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: Comparative Analysis of Modified Mini-Pterional and Standard Pterional Craniotomies.

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgical techniques for cerebral aneurysms have been developed.

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of modified mini-pterional (mMPT) and standard pterional (PT) craniotomies for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 45 patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms underwent surgical clipping; for 21 patients PT was used and for 24 patients mMPT was used. Initial clinical demographics and outcomes were retrospectively compared. A systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score was derived by summing the number of variables meeting standard criteria for SIRS.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable with initial clinical demographics. Total operative time was significantly shorter in the mMPT (166.6 minutes, P = 0.001) compared with the PT (235 minutes). The rate of permanent operative morbidity were similar in both groups (P = 0.92). The mean SIRS score at 24 hours after the completion of the operation was significantly lower for patients in the mMPT group (0.96, P = 0.01) as compared to the patients in the PT group (1.81). The rate of postoperative symptomatic vasospasm was significantly lower in patients operated through the mMPT (8.3%, P = 0.03) than the PT (38.1%). Good outcome at discharge was more frequently seen in the mMPT (91.7%) than in the PT (70%), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

The mMPT craniotomy is a safe and less invasive approach for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms, leading to a significant lower rate of postoperative symptomatic vasospasm and a marginally significant improvement in clinical outcomes.