Suppr超能文献

静态负荷下控制胫骨前移:两种支具的比较

Controlling anterior tibial displacement under static load: a comparison of two braces.

作者信息

Branch T, Hunter R, Reynolds P

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Orthopedics. 1988 Sep;11(9):1249-52. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19880901-06.

Abstract

This article presents data comparing the restraining effect of the Lenox Hill and the CTi brace to static loading using the KT-1000 Knee Ligament Arthrometer. Testing was performed at 25 degrees and 90 degrees in 15 patients with documented single ligament injuries involving the anterior cruciate. The opposite knee was determined to be normal by subjective and objective testing and was used as the control. Results showed that the anterior drawer tests, both the Lenox Hill and the CTi brace improved the ACL deficient knee significantly. With 15 lb of passive loading, both the Lenox Hill and the CTi brace improved the drawer to within normal limits. However, only the CTi brace was able to return the drawer to within the normal range at the 20 lb force level. Neither brace improved the drawer to normal when subjected to the higher loads created by an active drawer test. At 90 degrees, 15 lb of passive loading could not discriminate between the braced and the unbraced knee or between the normal and ACL deficient knee. When 20 lb of force was applied, only the CTi brace improved the drawer significantly, which placed the drawer into the normal range. Under static testing condition, the CTi brace proved to be better than the Lenox Hill in controlling the anterior drawer in flexion and at 20 lb of passive loads; however, when higher loading forces were used in the active anterior drawer test, neither brace was effective in controlling anterior tibial translation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本文介绍了使用KT-1000膝关节韧带测压仪比较Lenox Hill支具和CTi支具对静态负荷的抑制作用的数据。对15例记录在案的单纯前交叉韧带损伤患者在25度和90度时进行了测试。通过主观和客观测试确定对侧膝关节正常,并将其用作对照。结果表明,在进行前抽屉试验时,Lenox Hill支具和CTi支具均能显著改善前交叉韧带损伤的膝关节。在15磅的被动负荷下,Lenox Hill支具和CTi支具均能将抽屉试验结果改善至正常范围内。然而,只有CTi支具能够在20磅力水平时将抽屉试验结果恢复到正常范围内。当承受主动抽屉试验产生的更高负荷时,两种支具均不能将抽屉试验结果改善至正常。在90度时,15磅的被动负荷无法区分佩戴支具和未佩戴支具的膝关节,也无法区分正常膝关节和前交叉韧带损伤的膝关节。当施加20磅力时,只有CTi支具能显著改善抽屉试验结果,使其处于正常范围内。在静态测试条件下,CTi支具在控制屈曲位和20磅被动负荷下的前抽屉试验方面比Lenox Hill支具更好;然而,当在主动前抽屉试验中使用更高的负荷力时,两种支具在控制胫骨前移方面均无效。(摘要截短至250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验