Covin Yvonne N, Scielzo Shannon, Kirk Lynne, Barker Blake
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General and Hospital Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2019 May-Aug;32(2):87-90. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_206_16.
Despite focus on increasing the quality of ambulatory education training, few studies have examined residents' perceptions of learning during case discussions with their preceptors (i.e., "check-out"). The objective of this study was to assess the difference between residents' and preceptors' perceptions of behaviors that should occur during check-out discussions.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of categorical internal medicine and family medicine residents and preceptors. The survey was distributed electronically and assessed 20 components of the check-out discussion.
Of 38 preceptors, 22 (61%) completed the survey. Of 172 residents, 82 (48%) completed the survey. For residents, we identified discrepancies in desired and perceived check-out behaviors. Specifically, utilizing a dependent sample t-test, residents felt that all 20 areas needed additional teaching during check-out (P < 0.05). Preceptors believed that demonstrating physical examination skills in the patient room during check-out was significantly more important than did residents (P = 0.01). Increasing years of preceptor experience did not statistically relate to their valuation of components important to residents.
Our research highlighted a major deficiency in training in the check-out process, with residents desiring more patient management education in all components. Moreover, faculty and residents do not necessarily agree with what is an important focus in the "teachable moment." Our results serve as a training needs assessment for future faculty development seminars and highlight the need to consider resident learning needs in general.
尽管人们关注提高门诊教育培训质量,但很少有研究考察住院医师在与带教老师进行病例讨论(即“查房小结”)期间对学习的看法。本研究的目的是评估住院医师和带教老师对查房小结讨论期间应发生行为的看法之间的差异。
我们对内科和家庭医学专业的住院医师及带教老师进行了一项横断面调查。该调查通过电子方式分发,评估了查房小结讨论的20个方面。
38名带教老师中,22名(61%)完成了调查。172名住院医师中,82名(48%)完成了调查。对于住院医师,我们发现了期望的和实际感受到的查房小结行为之间的差异。具体而言,通过相关样本t检验,住院医师认为所有20个方面在查房小结期间都需要额外教学(P<0.05)。带教老师认为在查房小结期间在病房内演示体格检查技能比住院医师认为的要重要得多(P=0.01)。带教老师经验的增加与他们对住院医师重要的各个方面的评价在统计学上并无关联。
我们的研究突出了查房小结过程培训中的一个主要缺陷,住院医师希望在所有方面都能获得更多的患者管理教育。此外,教员和住院医师对于“可教时刻”的重要重点不一定意见一致。我们的结果可作为未来教员发展研讨会的培训需求评估,并总体上突出了考虑住院医师学习需求的必要性。