El-Masry Soha Mahmoud, El-Khodary Noha Mahmoud
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt.
Drug Res (Stuttg). 2020 Feb;70(2-03):91-96. doi: 10.1055/a-1035-9212. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
Nifedipine is one of calcium channel blockers that commonly used clinically to treat hypertension and angina in Egyptian patients. A sustained-release (SR) formulation of nifedipine is available in the Egyptian community and administered twice daily. This study aimed to to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of a 20 mg SR and IR (immediate release) formulation of nifedipine after single-dose administration in healthy Egyptian subjects. Randomized, crossed open-label two- way clinical trial, in 16 healthy adult volunteers, of 24.75±5.20 years, with BMI 23.26±1.756 were assessed. Blood samples were collected at predefined times for 48 h and analyzed for Nifedipine plasma concentrations using validated reversed phase liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection. Pharmacokinetics was determined using non- compartmental model pharmacokinetics and analyzed using one-way ANOVA (P≤0.05). Following a single oral administration, SR formulation had a lower C, compared to IR formulation (54.46±17.75 , 107.45±29.85 ng/mL, respectively), and T was significantly longer (2.97 vs. 1.13 h) for the SR and IR formulation, respectively. There was no significant difference between the SR and the IR formulations for AUC and AUC (326.7±98.28 vs. 309.27±105.53 ng·h·mL and 380.9 ± 105.24 vs. 334.36±108.1 ng·h·mL, respectively). SR formulation of nifedipine showed similar pharmacokinetics to the IR Formulation (F%=1.049), but it additionally allows a less frequent administration. Therefore, The nifedipine SR and IR formulations were well tolerated and displayed comparable safety profiles.
硝苯地平是临床上常用于治疗埃及患者高血压和心绞痛的钙通道阻滞剂之一。硝苯地平缓释(SR)制剂在埃及市面上有售,每日服用两次。本研究旨在比较20毫克硝苯地平SR制剂和速释(IR)制剂在健康埃及受试者单剂量给药后的药代动力学和安全性。对16名年龄在24.75±5.20岁、体重指数为23.26±1.756的健康成年志愿者进行了随机、交叉、开放标签的双向临床试验。在预定时间采集48小时的血样,采用经过验证的反相液相色谱法和紫外检测法分析硝苯地平血浆浓度。使用非房室模型药代动力学确定药代动力学,并采用单向方差分析(P≤0.05)进行分析。单次口服给药后,SR制剂的Cmax低于IR制剂(分别为54.46±17.75、107.45±29.85纳克/毫升),SR制剂和IR制剂的Tmax分别显著延长(2.97小时对1.13小时)。SR制剂和IR制剂的AUC和AUC(0-t)之间无显著差异(分别为326.7±98.28对309.27±105.53纳克·小时/毫升和380.9±105.24对334.36±108.1纳克·小时/毫升)。硝苯地平SR制剂显示出与IR制剂相似的药代动力学(F%=1.049),但给药频率更低。因此,硝苯地平SR制剂和IR制剂耐受性良好,安全性相当。