School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia; Research Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI), Toulouse University, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse 31062, France.
Charles Perkins Centre and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
J Insect Physiol. 2020 Jan;120:103983. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2019.103983. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
Many animals have been shown to select among nutritionally complementary foods to reach a specific balance of nutrients that optimizes key life history traits. Nutritional ecology theory, however, predicts that an animal with a diet that is very stable in its composition, and with nutritional requirements that do not vary in their balance through time, would not need to display such mechanisms of regulation. Here we use the Australian termite Nasutitermes exitiosus as a model to test this prediction for the first time. We used the nutritional geometric framework to investigate the regulation of carbohydrate and protein, as well as the effects on foraging behaviour of protein type and group caste composition and size. Our results support the prediction of nutritional ecology, as termites failed to actively defend a well-defined macronutrient ratio. Termites maintained food collection relatively constant across protein type and group composition, and only appear to vary their collection by avoiding diets too rich in protein.
许多动物被证明会在营养互补的食物中进行选择,以达到最佳的关键生命史特征的营养平衡。然而,营养生态学理论预测,如果一种动物的饮食在其组成上非常稳定,并且其营养需求在时间上没有平衡变化,那么它就不需要表现出这种调节机制。在这里,我们首次使用澳大利亚白蚁 Nasutitermes exitiosus 作为模型来检验这一预测。我们使用营养几何框架来研究碳水化合物和蛋白质的调节,以及蛋白质类型、群体等级组成和大小对觅食行为的影响。我们的结果支持了营养生态学的预测,因为白蚁未能积极地保护一个明确的宏量营养素比例。白蚁在蛋白质类型和群体组成上保持相对稳定的食物收集,似乎只是通过避免摄入蛋白质含量过高的食物来改变它们的收集。