Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas.
Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, Kansas.
J Card Fail. 2020 Feb;26(2):160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
The bioreactance technique is a relatively new, totally noninvasive technique that is used to measure cardiac output (CO) and is easy to use. The Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor (NICOM) is 1 such system. Although approved by the Food and Drug Administration for measurement of stroke volume, there is a paucity of literature validating this technology in decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock.
Fifty patients admitted to our cardiac intensive care unit for cardiogenic shock and Swan-Ganz catheter-guided therapy were prospectively enrolled in the study after informed consent. Simultaneous measurements of CO were obtained using NICOM, indirect Fick and bolus thermodilution. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the precision of NICOM for CO using the 3 repeated measurements of CO over the pooled data. The agreement of the NICOM device in the defined clinical population, compared to indirect Fick and thermodilution, was evaluated by comparing the Pearson correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altman plot and the Lin concordance correlation coefficient. The ICC for cardiac output measured by NICOM showed excellent repeatability (ICC = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.92-0.94, n = 262) in the pooled data. The Pearson correlation coefficient for cardiac output measured by NICOM was poor when compared to indirect Fick (n = 263, r = 0.132, P = 0.033) and TD (n = 258, r = 0.275, P < 0.001).
NICOM technology is not a reliable method of measuring CO in patients with decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock.
生物电阻抗技术是一种相对较新的、完全非侵入性的技术,用于测量心输出量(CO),并且易于使用。非侵入性心输出量监测仪(NICOM)就是这样的系统之一。尽管该技术已获得美国食品和药物管理局批准,可用于测量每搏量,但在心力衰竭失代偿和心源性休克中验证该技术的文献却很少。
在获得知情同意后,我们前瞻性地纳入了 50 名因心源性休克而入住我们心脏重症监护病房并接受 Swan-Ganz 导管引导治疗的患者。使用 NICOM、间接 Fick 和热稀释法同时测量 CO。使用 ICC 评估 3 次重复测量 CO 的 pooled 数据,以评估 NICOM 测量 CO 的精度。通过比较 Pearson 相关系数、Bland-Altman 图和 Lin 一致性相关系数,评估在定义明确的临床人群中,NICOM 设备与间接 Fick 和热稀释法的一致性。NICOM 测量 CO 的 ICC 在 pooled 数据中显示出极好的可重复性(ICC=0.93,95%CI=0.92-0.94,n=262)。NICOM 测量 CO 的 Pearson 相关系数与间接 Fick 相比较差(n=263,r=0.132,P=0.033),与 TD 相比更差(n=258,r=0.275,P<0.001)。
在心力衰竭失代偿和心源性休克患者中,NICOM 技术不是测量 CO 的可靠方法。