• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性注意在听觉和视觉特征之间的跨模态相互作用中的作用。

The Role of Selective Attention in Cross-modal Interactions between Auditory and Visual Features.

机构信息

University of York, Department of Psychology, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cognition. 2020 Mar;196:104119. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104119. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104119
PMID:31751823
Abstract

Evans and Treisman (2010) showed systematic interactions between audition and vision when participants made speeded classifications in one modality while supposedly ignoring another. We found perceptual facilitation between high pitch and high visual position, high spatial frequency and small size, and interference between high pitch and low position, low spatial frequency and large size, while the converse was the case between low pitch and the same visual features. The present study examined the role of selective attention in these cross-modal interactions. Participants performed speeded classification or search tasks of low or high load while attempting to ignore irrelevant stimuli in a different modality. In both paradigms, congruency between the visual and the irrelevant auditory stimulus had an equal effect in the low and in the high perceptual load conditions. A third experiment tested divided attention, requiring participants to compare stimuli across modalities and respond to the visual-auditory compound. The congruency effect was as large with attention focused on one modality as when it was divided across both. These findings offer converging evidence that cross-modal interactions between corresponding basic features are independent of selective attention.

摘要

埃文斯和特雷西曼(2010)表明,当参与者在一种模式下快速进行分类,而同时假定忽略另一种模式时,听觉和视觉之间存在系统的相互作用。我们发现,在高音和高视觉位置、高空间频率和小尺寸之间存在感知促进,而在高音和低位置、低空间频率和大尺寸之间存在干扰,而在低音和相同的视觉特征之间则相反。本研究考察了选择性注意在这些跨模态相互作用中的作用。参与者在执行低或高负载的快速分类或搜索任务时,试图忽略不同模态中的无关刺激。在这两种范式中,视觉和无关听觉刺激之间的一致性在低和高知觉负载条件下都具有相同的效果。第三个实验测试了分散注意力,要求参与者跨模态比较刺激并对视觉-听觉复合刺激做出反应。当注意力集中在一种模态上时,与注意力分散在两种模态上时相比,一致性效应一样大。这些发现提供了一致的证据,表明相应基本特征之间的跨模态相互作用独立于选择性注意。

相似文献

1
The Role of Selective Attention in Cross-modal Interactions between Auditory and Visual Features.选择性注意在听觉和视觉特征之间的跨模态相互作用中的作用。
Cognition. 2020 Mar;196:104119. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104119. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
2
Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.时间和空间上的跨模态交互:听觉对半侧空间忽视中视觉注意的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Aug;18(8):1368-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1368.
3
Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.跨模态感知负荷:模态及个体差异的影响
Exp Brain Res. 2016 May;234(5):1279-91. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4517-0. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.视觉/触觉跨通道似动与听觉运动在双臂不交叉和交叉情况下的相互影响。
Multisens Res. 2013;26(1-2):19-51. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002409.
5
Neural practice effect during cross-modal selective attention: Supra-modal and modality-specific effects.跨模态选择性注意中的神经练习效应:超模态和模态特异性效应。
Cortex. 2018 Sep;106:47-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
Vision dominates at the preresponse level and audition dominates at the response level in cross-modal interaction: behavioral and neural evidence.在跨模态交互中,视觉在预反应水平占主导地位,听觉在反应水平占主导地位:行为和神经证据。
J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 24;33(17):7109-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1985-12.2013.
7
The effects of stimulus modality and frequency of stimulus presentation on cross-modal distraction.刺激方式及刺激呈现频率对跨通道分心的影响。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 May;19(5):993-1007. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn148. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
8
Interactions Between Auditory Elevation, Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation During Multisensory Perception.多感官知觉过程中听觉高度、听觉音高与视觉高度之间的相互作用
Multisens Res. 2017 Jan 1;30(3-5):287-306. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002553.
9
The effects of association strength and cross-modal correspondence on the development of multimodal stimuli.关联强度和跨模态对应对多模态刺激发展的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Feb;77(2):560-70. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0794-0.
10
Pitch-elevation and pitch-size cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism.调宽-调高跨模态对应关系不会影响时间上的头位语音错觉。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Apr;84(3):1052-1063. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02455-w. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Multisensory integration, brain plasticity and optogenetics in visual rehabilitation.视觉康复中的多感官整合、脑可塑性与光遗传学
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 10;16:1590305. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1590305. eCollection 2025.
2
Study-test overlap rather than multisensory integration benefits memory.学习测试重叠而非多感官整合有益于记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01759-0.
3
Is scenery mandatory for restoration? Attention restoration without visual nature elements.风景对于恢复注意力是必不可少的吗?没有视觉自然元素的注意力恢复。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 1;16:1556672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1556672. eCollection 2025.
4
Assessing the limits on size-pitch mapping reveals the interplay between top-down and bottom-up influences on relative crossmodal correspondences.评估大小-音高映射的限制揭示了自上而下和自下而上的影响在相对跨模态对应关系中的相互作用。
Psychol Res. 2025 Feb 17;89(2):53. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02082-8.
5
Hear it here: Built environments predict ratings and descriptions of ambiguous sounds.在此聆听:建筑环境可预测对模糊声音的评级和描述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 15;20(1):e0316187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316187. eCollection 2025.
6
The Visual Advantage Effect in Comparing Uni-Modal and Cross-Modal Probabilistic Category Learning.单模态与跨模态概率类别学习比较中的视觉优势效应
J Intell. 2023 Nov 27;11(12):218. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11120218.
7
Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.跨模态对应是否调节模态特定的感知处理?使用定时判断任务的研究。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):273-284. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02812-3. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
8
Attentional focusing and filtering in multisensory categorization.多感官分类中的注意力聚焦与筛选
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):708-720. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02370-7. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
9
Effect of Target Semantic Consistency in Different Sequence Positions and Processing Modes on T2 Recognition: Integration and Suppression Based on Cross-Modal Processing.不同序列位置和加工模式下目标语义一致性对T2识别的影响:基于跨模态加工的整合与抑制
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 16;13(2):340. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020340.
10
Cross-modal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration.听觉音高与视觉高度的跨模态对应调节视听时间校准。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 9;12(1):21308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25614-3.