Department of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Department of Geriatric and General Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;5(11):1319-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between residual premature atrial contractions (PACs) originating from non-pulmonary veins (PVs), which do not initiate atrial fibrillation (AF), and AF recurrence after ablation.
Residual atrial ectopic beats that trigger AF from non-PVs (non-PV AF triggers) after catheter ablation are among the major causes of AF recurrence. However, little is known about the impact of non-PV PACs on AF recurrence.
This retrospective study included 565 consecutive patients who underwent first-time AF ablation at our institution. After PV isolation, we infused isoproterenol to provoke non-PV AF triggers and/or non-PV PACs. We excluded 26 patients with non-PV AF triggers and 3 patients who underwent ablation of non-PV PACs, and finally analyzed 536 patients. Non-PV PACs were defined as ectopic beats that were constantly observed with the same intra-atrial activation patterns from non-PVs.
Residual non-PV PACs during the procedure were observed in 112 patients (21%). There was no significant difference in the AF recurrence rate between patients with non-PV PACs (35 of 112, 31%) and those without (145 of 424, 34%; log-rank p = 0.69), during a median follow-up of 670 days. Age- and sex-adjusted hazards for AF recurrence were also similar between the 2 groups.
The similar AF recurrence rate in patients with and without non-PV PACs suggests that the additional ablation of non-PV PACs has limited effect on AF recurrence.
本研究旨在探讨不引发心房颤动(AF)的非肺静脉(PV)起源的剩余房性期前收缩(PACs)与消融后 AF 复发之间的关系。
导管消融后源自非 PV(非 PV AF 触发)的剩余房性异位搏动是 AF 复发的主要原因之一。然而,对于非 PV PACs 对 AF 复发的影响知之甚少。
这项回顾性研究纳入了在我院行首次 AF 消融的 565 例连续患者。在 PV 隔离后,我们给予异丙肾上腺素以诱发非 PV AF 触发和/或非 PV PACs。我们排除了 26 例有非 PV AF 触发的患者和 3 例接受非 PV PACs 消融的患者,最终分析了 536 例患者。非 PV PACs 定义为从非 PV 始终以相同的房内激活模式观察到的异位搏动。
112 例患者(21%)在手术过程中观察到残留的非 PV PACs。有非 PV PACs 的患者(35/112,31%)和无非 PV PACs 的患者(424/112,34%;log-rank p=0.69)的 AF 复发率在中位数为 670 天的随访期间无显著差异。两组之间年龄和性别调整后的 AF 复发风险也相似。
有和无非 PV PACs 的患者的 AF 复发率相似,提示对非 PV PACs 的额外消融对 AF 复发的影响有限。