Mørkve O, Skaarland E, Myking A, Stangeland L, Gulsvik A
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland Hospital, University of Bergen, Norway.
Respiration. 1988;53(4):239-45. doi: 10.1159/000195430.
During a 3-year period, 19 physicians performed 271 transthoracic fine-needle aspirations (FNA) in 199 patients, using a 23-guage aspiration needle with an 18-guage guiding needle. The diagnosis was confirmed by cytological examination of the needle aspirates in 90 out of 122 patients with malignant tumors, giving a sensitivity of 74%. The specificity of the cytological diagnosis was 100%. Both cytological and histological material was available in 49 patients. The tumor typing from the FNA specimens and the biopsies was in agreement in all but 3 cases. Pneumothorax occurred in 27% of the patients, but only 3.5% required tube drainage. Small variations (p greater than 0.05) in number of diagnostic punctures and rate of complications were evident among the participating physicians and between two fluoroscopic equipments.
在3年期间,19名医生使用带有18号引导针的23号穿刺针,对199名患者进行了271次经胸细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)。122例恶性肿瘤患者中,90例经针吸物的细胞学检查确诊,敏感性为74%。细胞学诊断的特异性为100%。49例患者同时有细胞学和组织学材料。除3例病例外,FNA标本与活检的肿瘤分型均一致。27%的患者发生气胸,但仅3.5%的患者需要置管引流。参与的医生之间以及两台荧光透视设备之间,诊断穿刺次数和并发症发生率存在微小差异(p>0.05)。