Friends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan 1;206:107680. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107680. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
Opioid use disorder is common among detainees in US jails, yet methadone treatment is rarely initiated.
This is a three-group randomized controlled trial in which 225 detainees in Baltimore treated for opioid withdrawal were assigned to: (1) interim methadone (IM) with patient navigation (IM + PN); (2) IM; or (3) enhanced treatment-as-usual (ETAU). Participants in both IM groups were able to enter standard methadone treatment upon release, while ETAU participants received an assessment/referral number. Follow-up assessments at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-release determined treatment enrollment, urine drug testing results, self-reported days of drug use, criminal activity, and overdose events. Generalized linear mixed modelling examined two planned contrasts: (1) IM groups combined vs. ETAU; and (2) IM + PN vs. IM.
On an intention-to-treat basis, compared to ETAU, significantly more participants in the combined IM groups were in treatment 30 days post-release, while the IM + PN vs. IM groups did not significantly differ. By month 12, there were no significant differences in the estimated marginal means of enrollment in any kind of drug treatment (0.40 and 0.27 for IM + PN and IM groups, respectively, compared to 0.29 for ETAU). There were no significant differences for either contrast in opioid-positive tests, although all groups reported a sharp decrease in heroin use from baseline to follow-up. There were five fatal overdoses, but none occurred during methadone treatment.
Initiating methadone treatment in jail was effective in promoting entry into community-based drug abuse treatment but subsequent treatment discontinuation attenuated any potential impact of such treatment.
阿片类药物使用障碍在美囯监狱的被拘留者中很常见,但很少启动美沙酮治疗。
这是一项三組随机对照试验,巴尔的摩 225 名接受阿片类药物戒断治疗的被拘留者被分配到:(1)有患者导航的临时美沙酮(IM)+ PN;(2)IM;或(3)增强的常规治疗(ETAU)。两个 IM 组的参与者在释放后都可以进入标准美沙酮治疗,而 ETAU 参与者则获得评估/转介号码。释放后 1、3、6 和 12 个月的随访评估确定了治疗登记、尿液药物检测结果、自我报告的用药天数、犯罪活动和过量事件。广义线性混合模型检查了两个计划的对比:(1)IM 组联合与 ETAU;和(2)IM+PN 与 IM。
基于意向治疗,与 ETAU 相比,联合 IM 组的参与者在释放后 30 天内接受治疗的人数明显更多,而 IM+PN 与 IM 组之间没有显著差异。在 12 个月时,任何类型的药物治疗的登记的估计边缘均值均无显著差异(分别为 IM+PN 和 IM 组的 0.40 和 0.27,而 ETAU 组为 0.29)。两种对比都没有在阿片类药物阳性测试方面存在显著差异,尽管所有组在随访时都报告了海洛因使用量从基线到随访的急剧下降。有五例致命性过量,但没有一例发生在美沙酮治疗期间。
在监狱中启动美沙酮治疗对促进进入社区药物滥用治疗有效,但随后的治疗中断削弱了这种治疗的任何潜在影响。