Fernandez Forrest B, Ong Adrian, Martin Anthony P, Schwab C William, Wasser Tom, Butts Christopher A, McNicholas Amanda R, Muller Alison L, Barbera Charles F, Trupp Rachael, Sigal Adam P
Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Reading Hospital, Reading, PA, USA.
Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 29;11:241-247. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S212617. eCollection 2019.
Geriatric patients are at increased risk of injury following low-energy mechanisms and are less tolerant of injury. Current criteria for trauma team activation (TTA) often miss these injuries. We evaluated a novel triage process for an expedited Emergency Medicine Physician evaluation protocol (T3) for at-risk geriatric sub-populations not meeting trauma team activation (TTA) criteria.
Retrospective review of injured patients (≥65 years) from a Level II Trauma Center with an Injury Severity Score (ISS < 16), prior to (Pre-T3, Jan 2007-Oct 2009), and after (Post-T3, Jan 2010-Oct 2012), implementation of T3, as well as a contemporary period (CP, Jan 2013-Oct 2015). Demographics, physiologic variables, and timeliness of care were measured. Rates of ICU admission, operative procedures and lengths of stay and in-hospital mortality were compared for all periods. Logistic regression analysis determined variables independently associated with mortality.
Post-T3, 49.2% of geriatric registry patients underwent T3 with a reduction in key time intervals. Median time to evaluation (42.1 mins vs 61.7 min, p<0.001), median time to CT (161.3 mins vs 212.9 mins, p<0.001) and EDLOS (364.6 mins vs 451.5 mins, p=0.023) were all reduced compared to non-expedited evaluations. There was no change in mortality after the implementation of the protocol.
The T3 protocol expedited patient evaluation of at-risk geriatric patients that would not otherwise meet TTA criteria. The new process met the goals of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program while conserving resources.
老年患者在低能量机制损伤后受伤风险增加,且对损伤的耐受性较低。当前的创伤团队启动标准(TTA)常常会遗漏这些损伤。我们评估了一种新型分诊流程,用于对未达到创伤团队启动(TTA)标准的高危老年亚人群进行快速急诊医学医师评估方案(T3)。
回顾性分析来自二级创伤中心的受伤患者(≥65岁),这些患者的损伤严重程度评分(ISS < 16),在实施T3之前(T3前,2007年1月至2009年10月)、之后(T3后,2010年1月至2012年10月),以及当代时期(CP,2013年1月至2015年10月)。测量人口统计学、生理变量和护理及时性。比较所有时期的重症监护病房(ICU)入住率、手术操作、住院时间和院内死亡率。逻辑回归分析确定与死亡率独立相关的变量。
在T3后,49.2%的老年登记患者接受了T3评估,关键时间间隔缩短。与非快速评估相比,评估的中位时间(42.1分钟对61.7分钟,p<0.001)、CT检查的中位时间(161.3分钟对212.9分钟,p<0.001)和急诊住院时间(EDLOS,364.6分钟对451.5分钟,p = 0.023)均有所缩短。该方案实施后死亡率没有变化。
T3方案加快了对否则不符合TTA标准的高危老年患者的评估。新流程在节约资源的同时达到了美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目的目标。