Popping Stephanie, Nichols Brooke, Rijnders Bart, van Kampen Jeroen, Verbon Annelies, Boucher Charles, van de Vijver David
Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Global Health, Boston University, Boston, United States.
J Virus Erad. 2019 Nov 4;5(4):179-190. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30031-5.
The World Health Organization declared the goal of hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination by 2030. Micro-elimination, which is the reduction of incidence to zero in targeted populations, is less complex and costly and may be the first step to prove whether elimination is feasible. A suitable target group are HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) because of their high-risk behaviour and high incidence rates. Moreover, HCV monitoring is integrated in HIV care. The current HCV monitoring approach is suboptimal and complex and may miss new HCV infections. Alternative monitoring strategies, based on alanine aminotransferase, HCV-PCR and HCV-core antigen (HCV-cAg), combined with immediate direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment, may be more effective in reducing new HCV infections.
A deterministic mathematical transmission model was constructed representing the Dutch HCV epidemic among HIV-positive MSM to compare different HCV monitoring strategies from 2018 onwards. We evaluated the epidemiological impact of alternative and intensified monitoring in MSM with HCV. In addition, the cost-effectiveness was calculated over a lifetime horizon.
Current HCV monitoring and treatment is projected to result in an incidence of 1.1/1000 person-years, 0.24% prevalence, at a cost of €61.8 million (interquartile range 52.2-73.9). Compared with current monitoring, intensified monitoring will result in a maximum 27% reduction of incidence and 33% in prevalence at an increased cost. Conversely, compared with current monitoring, targeted HCV-cAg monitoring will result in a comparable incidence (1.1/1000 person-years) and prevalence (0.23%) but will be €1 million cheaper with increased quality-adjusted life year.
Targeted monitoring reduces the HCV epidemic in a cost-saving manner; however, micro-elimination may not be obtained by 2030, highlighting the need for harm-reduction programmes.
世界卫生组织宣布了到2030年消除丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的目标。微观消除,即在目标人群中将发病率降至零,其复杂性和成本较低,可能是证明消除是否可行的第一步。由于其高危行为和高发病率,感染艾滋病毒的男男性行为者(MSM)是一个合适的目标群体。此外,丙型肝炎病毒监测已纳入艾滋病毒护理。目前的丙型肝炎病毒监测方法并不理想且复杂,可能会遗漏新的丙型肝炎病毒感染。基于丙氨酸转氨酶、HCV-PCR和HCV核心抗原(HCV-cAg)的替代监测策略,结合直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)立即治疗,可能在减少新的丙型肝炎病毒感染方面更有效。
构建了一个确定性数学传播模型,以描述荷兰艾滋病毒阳性男男性行为者中的丙型肝炎病毒流行情况,比较2018年起不同的丙型肝炎病毒监测策略。我们评估了丙型肝炎病毒替代监测和强化监测对男男性行为者的流行病学影响。此外,还计算了终身成本效益。
预计目前的丙型肝炎病毒监测和治疗将导致发病率为1.1/1000人年,患病率为0.24%,成本为6180万欧元(四分位间距5220 - 7390万欧元)。与目前的监测相比,强化监测将使发病率最多降低27%,患病率降低33%,但成本会增加。相反,与目前的监测相比,有针对性的HCV-cAg监测将导致类似的发病率(1.1/1000人年)和患病率(0.23%),但成本将降低100万欧元,同时质量调整生命年会增加。
有针对性的监测以节省成本的方式减少了丙型肝炎病毒的流行;然而,到2030年可能无法实现微观消除,这突出了减少危害计划的必要性。