Sieber Alexander
Independent researcher, Brookfield, WI, USA.
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2019 Nov 22;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40504-019-0095-4.
Modern neurotechnologies are rapidly infringing on conventional notions of human dignity and they are challenging what it means to be human. This article is a survey analysis of the future of the digital age, reflecting primarily on the effects of neurotechnology that violate universal human rights to dignity, self-determination, and privacy. In particular, this article focuses on neuromarketing to critically assess potentially negative social ramifications of under-regulated neurotechnological application. Possible solutions are critically evaluated, including the human rights claim to the 'right to mental privacy' and the suggestion of a new human right based on spiritual jurisdiction, where the human psyche is a legal space in a substantive legal setting.
现代神经技术正在迅速侵犯关于人类尊严的传统观念,并且正在挑战作为人类意味着什么。本文是对数字时代未来的一项调查分析,主要反思了侵犯人类尊严、自决权和隐私权等普遍人权的神经技术的影响。特别是,本文聚焦于神经营销,以批判性地评估监管不足的神经技术应用可能产生的负面社会影响。对可能的解决方案进行了批判性评估,包括对“精神隐私权利”的人权主张,以及基于精神管辖权提出的一项新的人权建议,即在实质性法律环境中,人类心理是一个法律空间。