• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推特活跃度与胸外科医生的更高学术引用索引相关。

Twitter Activity Is Associated With a Higher Research Citation Index for Academic Thoracic Surgeons.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Thoracic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Aug;110(2):660-663. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.075. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.075
PMID:31756321
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Academic surgeons are encouraged to promote their work on social media. We hypothesized that thoracic surgeons who are active on Twitter have a higher research citation index (Hirsch index [h-index]) than their counterparts who are not.

METHODS

Thoracic surgeons on CTSNet.org in Canada and the United States were queried for profiles with an h-index on Google Scholar and/or Research Gate in July 2018. Surgeons were categorized by whether they possessed a Twitter account (T+) or not (T-), and h-index values were compared. Within the T+ cohort a multivariate regression model was used to identify independent predictors of increased h-index among variables related to Twitter activity.

RESULTS

Of 3741 surgeons queried, 19.3% (722) had a known h-index. The mean h-index for the entire cohort was 14.54 (SD, 15.73). The median h-index was 10 (range, 0-121), and the 75th percentile h-index was 20. T+ surgeons had a median h-index of 10 (range, 0-66), and T- surgeons had a median h-index of 10 (range, 0-72; P = .25). The 75th percentile h-index for T+ surgeons was 23 compared with 20 for T- surgeons (P = .24). For T+ surgeons the regression model identified the number of followers (P = .029), the number of people followed (P = .048), and the frequency of tweeting (P = .046) as independent predictors of a higher h-index.

CONCLUSIONS

The median h-index for an academic thoracic surgeon in Canada and the United States is 10. Surgeons who engage in Twitter activity are more likely to have their research cited by others.

摘要

背景

鼓励学术外科医生在社交媒体上宣传他们的工作。我们假设,在 Twitter 上活跃的胸外科医生比不活跃的医生的研究引文索引(Hirsch 指数[h-index])更高。

方法

2018 年 7 月,在加拿大和美国的 CTSNet.org 上查询胸外科医生的 Google Scholar 和/或 Research Gate 个人资料,以获取 h-index。根据是否拥有 Twitter 账户(T+)或没有(T-)对医生进行分类,并比较 h-index 值。在 T+队列中,使用多元回归模型来确定与 Twitter 活动相关的变量中增加 h-index 的独立预测因素。

结果

在查询的 3741 名外科医生中,19.3%(722 名)有已知的 h-index。整个队列的平均 h-index 为 14.54(SD,15.73)。中位数 h-index 为 10(范围,0-121),75%分位数 h-index 为 20。T+外科医生的中位数 h-index 为 10(范围,0-66),T-外科医生的中位数 h-index 为 10(范围,0-72;P=.25)。T+外科医生的 75%分位数 h-index 为 23,而 T-外科医生的 75%分位数 h-index 为 20(P=.24)。对于 T+外科医生,回归模型确定了关注者的数量(P=.029)、关注者的数量(P=.048)和发推的频率(P=.046)是 h-index 更高的独立预测因素。

结论

加拿大和美国学术胸外科医生的中位数 h-index 为 10。参与 Twitter 活动的外科医生更有可能被他人引用其研究成果。

相似文献

1
Twitter Activity Is Associated With a Higher Research Citation Index for Academic Thoracic Surgeons.推特活跃度与胸外科医生的更高学术引用索引相关。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Aug;110(2):660-663. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.075. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
2
The Top 100 Social Media Influencers in Plastic Surgery on Twitter: Who Should You Be Following?推特上整形手术领域的前100名社交媒体有影响力的人:你应该关注谁?
Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Jul 13;38(8):913-917. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy024.
3
Characteristics of General Surgery Social Media Influencers on Twitter.社交媒体上普通外科医生大 V 的特征。
Am Surg. 2021 Mar;87(3):492-498. doi: 10.1177/0003134820951427. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
Google Ranking of Plastic Surgeons Values Social Media Presence Over Academic Pedigree and Experience.谷歌对整形医生的排名看重社交媒体的影响力而非学术背景和经验。
Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Mar 14;39(4):447-451. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy285.
5
Who should you be following? The top 100 social media influencers in orthopaedic surgery.你应该关注谁?骨科手术领域的前100名社交媒体有影响力的人。
World J Orthop. 2019 Sep 18;10(9):327-338. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i9.327.
6
Twitter and academic Urology in the United States and Canada: a comprehensive assessment of the Twitterverse in 2019.推特与美加泌尿科医学:2019 年推特全景剖析
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):173-181. doi: 10.1111/bju.14920. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
7
Social Media and Pediatric Scoliosis: An Analysis of Patient and Surgeon Use.社交媒体与小儿脊柱侧弯:患者及外科医生使用情况分析
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Oct 12;31:189-196.
8
Social Media Influence Does Not Reflect Scholarly or Clinical Activity in Real Life.社交媒体影响力并不能反映现实生活中的学术或临床活动。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;13(11):e008847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008847. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
9
What Effect Does Self-Citation Have on Bibliometric Measures in Academic Plastic Surgery?自我引用对整形外科学术文献计量指标有何影响?
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Sep;77(3):350-3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000585.
10
Academic tweeting in #ObGyn. Where do we stand?妇产科领域的学术推文:我们处于什么位置?
J Perinat Med. 2019 Oct 25;47(8):867-870. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0166.

引用本文的文献

1
Power to the People: Measuring Social Media and Mass Media Impact for Promotion and Tenure in Social and Applied Sciences.权力属于人民:衡量社交媒体和大众媒体在社会科学与应用科学领域促进晋升和终身教职方面的影响
High Educ Policy. 2025 Mar;38(1):203-222. doi: 10.1057/s41307-023-00337-w. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
2
Current insights on social media as a tool for the dissemination of research and education in surgery: a narrative review.社交媒体作为外科领域研究和教育传播工具的最新见解:叙事性综述。
Surg Today. 2024 Oct;54(10):1113-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02891-1. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
3
Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study.
推特上学术性耳鼻咽喉科学的受众:横断面研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2021 Dec 8;7(4):e25654. doi: 10.2196/25654.
4
Social media in surgery: evolving role in research communication and beyond.社交媒体在外科领域的应用:在研究传播及其他领域中的不断演变的角色。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):505-520. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02135-7. Epub 2021 Feb 28.