A reply letter to: "A commentary on "continuous adductor canal block is a better choice compared to single shot after primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" (Int J Surg 2019 Oct 12. pii: S1743-9191(19)30277-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.012. [Epub ahead of print]".
作者信息
Zhao Jie, Kang Zhenming
机构信息
Department of Anesthesiology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, 362000, China.
出版信息
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:249. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
PMID:31756549
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A reply letter to: "A commentary on "continuous adductor canal block is a better choice compared to single shot after primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" (Int J Surg 2019 Oct 12. pii: S1743-9191(19)30277-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.012. [Epub ahead of print]".
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:249. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
3
A commentary on "Continuous adductor canal block is a better choice compared to single shot after primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" [Int J Surg 2019; Epub ahead of print].对《全膝关节置换术后持续收肌管阻滞优于单次注射：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析》的述评[《国际外科学杂志》2019年；已在线发表，印刷版前]
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:192-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
4
A commentary on "Continuous adductor canal block is a better choice compared to single shot after primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" [Int. J. Surg. 2019; Epub ahead of print].对《初次全膝关节置换术后持续收肌管阻滞相比单次注射是更好的选择：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析》的述评 [《国际外科学杂志》2019年；在线优先发表]
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.041. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
5
A commentary on "Continuous adductor canal block is a better choice compared to single shot after primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" (Int J surg 2019; Epub ahead of print).对《初次全膝关节置换术后持续收肌管阻滞优于单次注射：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析》（《国际外科学杂志》2019年；电子版先于印刷版发表）的述评
Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.010. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
6
Reply to a commentary on "Continuous adductor canal block is a better choice compared to single shot after primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" [Int J Surg. 2019 Nov 18; 72:192-193].对一篇关于“初次全膝关节置换术后持续股内收肌管阻滞比单次注射是更好的选择：随机对照试验的荟萃分析”的评论的回复[《国际外科学杂志》。2019年11月18日；72:192 - 193]
Int J Surg. 2020 Feb;74:65-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.014. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
7
Letter to the editor on "Comparison of adductor canal block with local infiltration analgesia in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" [(Int J Surg 2019; 69:89-97) and on the letter to the editor (Int J Surg 2019; Epub ahead of print)].
Int J Surg. 2020 Feb;74:41-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.025. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
8
Response to the commentary on "Comparison of adductor canal block with local infiltration analgesia in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" (Int J Surg 2019; Epub ahead of print).
Int J Surg. 2020 Feb;74:120-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Invited commentary on "postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Int J Surg. 2019 Sep 30. pii: S1743-9191(19)30262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.030. [Epub ahead of print].关于“老年胰腺癌患者行胰腺切除术后的结局：系统评价与荟萃分析”的特邀评论。《国际外科学杂志》。2019年9月30日。文章编号：S1743 - 9191(19)30262 - 6。doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.030。[印刷前在线发表]
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.034. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
Zotero 插件