Marcin James P, Romano Patrick S, Dayal Parul, Dharmar Madan, Chamberlain James M, Dudley Nanette, Macias Charles G, Nigrovic Lise E, Powell Elizabeth C, Rogers Alexander J, Sonnett Meridith, Tzimenatos Leah, Alpern Elizabeth R, Andrews-Dickert Rebecca, Borgialli Dominic A, Sidney Erika, Casper T Charles, Kuppermann Nathan
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis School of Medicine (JP Marcin, PS Romano, P Dayal, M Dharmar, and N Kuppermann), Sacramento, Calif.
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis School of Medicine (JP Marcin, PS Romano, P Dayal, M Dharmar, and N Kuppermann), Sacramento, Calif; Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine (PS Romano), Sacramento, Calif.
Acad Pediatr. 2020 May-Jun;20(4):524-531. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
Differences in the quality of emergency department (ED) care are often attributed to nonclinical factors such as variations in the structure, systems, and processes of care. Few studies have examined these associations among children. We aimed to determine whether process measures of quality of care delivered to patients receiving care in children's hospital EDs were associated with physician-level or hospital-level factors.
We included children (<18 years old) who presented to any of the 12 EDs participating in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) between January 2011 and December 2011. We measured quality of care from medical record reviews using a previously validated implicit review instrument with a summary score ranging from 5 to 35, and examined associations between process measures of quality and physician- and hospital-level factors using a mixed-effects linear regression model adjusted for patient case-mix, with hospital site as a random effect.
Among the 620 ED encounters reviewed, we did not find process measures of quality to be associated with any physician-level factors such as physician sex, years since medical school graduation, or physician training. We found, however, that process measures of quality were positively associated with delivery at freestanding children's hospitals (1.96 points higher in quality compared to nonfreestanding status, 95% confidence interval: 0.49, 3.43) and negatively associated with higher annual ED patient volume (-0.03 points per thousand patients, 95% confidence interval: -0.05, -0.01).
Process measures of quality of care delivered to children were higher among patients treated at freestanding children's hospitals but lower among patients treated at higher volume EDs.
急诊科(ED)护理质量的差异通常归因于非临床因素,如护理结构、系统和流程的变化。很少有研究探讨儿童中的这些关联。我们旨在确定儿童医院急诊科为患者提供的护理质量的过程指标是否与医生层面或医院层面的因素相关。
我们纳入了2011年1月至2011年12月期间在参与儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)的12家急诊科中的任何一家就诊的18岁以下儿童。我们使用先前验证的隐性审查工具通过病历审查来衡量护理质量,该工具的总结分数范围为5至35,并使用针对患者病例组合进行调整的混合效应线性回归模型,将医院地点作为随机效应,研究质量过程指标与医生和医院层面因素之间的关联。
在审查的620次急诊科就诊中,我们没有发现质量过程指标与任何医生层面的因素相关,如医生性别、医学院毕业年限或医生培训。然而,我们发现质量过程指标与独立儿童医院的分娩呈正相关(与非独立状态相比,质量高1.96分,95%置信区间:0.49,3.43),与较高的年度急诊科患者数量呈负相关(每千名患者-0.03分,95%置信区间:-0.05,-0.01)。
在独立儿童医院接受治疗的儿童中,所提供护理质量的过程指标较高,但在患者数量较多的急诊科接受治疗的儿童中较低。