Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y.
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jul;124(1):116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
Studies evaluating the dimensional stability of denture bases fabricated by the double processing method are lacking.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the dimensional stability of denture bases fabricated by 3 different techniques: compression molding, injection molding, and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) subtraction milling.
Forty-five mandibular denture bases were fabricated from a master cast by a standardized process. A double processing protocol was used with 3 methods: compression molding (PRESS), injection molding (INJECT), or CAD-CAM (CAD). The bases were compared with the titanium master cast after the first processing. By a digital subtraction process, the dimensional stability of the bases was measured at 22 different locations on the intaglio surface. Denture teeth were then positioned according to a standardized protocol, and the denture was processed a second time and finished. The dimensional discrepancy was reassessed after the second processing and compared with the titanium master cast.
In all groups, most of the dimensional changes occurred during the first processing (P<.05), with no statistically significant deformation occurring during the second processing (P>.05). The CAD group presented significantly smaller dimensional changes than PRESS (P<.05) and INJECT (P<.05) groups. No significant difference was found in the dimensional stability in the PRESS and INJECT groups (P>.05).
Denture bases fabricated by a CAD-CAM methodology exhibit fewer dimensional changes than either compression or injection molding. Distortion occurred during the fabrication of the denture base, and a second processing did not significantly affect the dimensional stability of the denture base.
缺乏评估双重加工法制作的义齿基托尺寸稳定性的研究。
本体外研究的目的是评估通过 3 种不同技术(压缩成型、注塑成型和计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)减法铣削)制作的义齿基托的尺寸稳定性。
从标准工艺的主模型铸造中制作了 45 个下颌义齿基托。使用 3 种方法(压缩成型(PRESS)、注塑成型(INJECT)或 CAD-CAM(CAD))采用双重加工方案。基托与第一加工后的钛主模型进行比较。通过数字减法过程,在印模表面的 22 个不同位置测量基托的尺寸稳定性。然后根据标准协议定位义齿牙,进行第二次加工和完成。第二次加工后重新评估尺寸差异,并与钛主模型进行比较。
在所有组中,大多数尺寸变化都发生在第一次加工期间(P<.05),第二次加工期间没有发生统计学上显著的变形(P>.05)。CAD 组的尺寸变化明显小于 PRESS(P<.05)和 INJECT(P<.05)组。PRESS 和 INJECT 组的尺寸稳定性没有显著差异(P>.05)。
通过 CAD-CAM 方法制作的义齿基托比压缩或注塑成型的义齿基托的尺寸变化更小。在义齿基托的制作过程中发生了变形,第二次加工并没有显著影响义齿基托的尺寸稳定性。