Wolffsohn James S, Calossi Antonio, Cho Pauline, Gifford Kate, Jones Lyndon, Jones Deborah, Guthrie Sarah, Li Ming, Lipener Cesar, Logan Nicola S, Malet Florence, Peixoto-de-Matos Sofia C, González-Méijome José M, Nichols Jason J, Orr Janis B, Santodomingo-Rubido Jacinto, Schaefer Tania, Thite Nilesh, van der Worp Eef, Tarutta Elena, Iomdina Elena, Ali Bariah Mohd, Villa-Collar César, Abesamis-Dichoso Carmen, Chen Connie, Pult Heiko, Blaser Pascal, Parra Sandra Johanna Garzon, Iqbal Fatima, Ramos Raul, Carrillo Orihuela Guillermo, Boychev Nikolay
School of Health & Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Physics (Optics and Optometry), University of Florence, Italy.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 Feb;43(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
A survey in 2015 identified a high level of eye care practitioner concern about myopia with a reported moderately high level of activity, but the vast majority still prescribed single vision interventions to young myopes. This research aimed to update these findings 4 years later.
A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in eight languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy of available strategies and adoption levels of such strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies.
Of the 1336 respondents, concern was highest (9.0 ± 1.6; p < 0.001) in Asia and lowest (7.6 ± 2.2; p < 0.001) in Australasia. Practitioners from Asia also considered their clinical practice of myopia control to be the most active (7.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.001), the North American practitioners being the least active (6.3 ± 2.9; p < 0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by pharmaceutical approaches and approved myopia control soft contact lenses (p < 0.001). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall, most practitioners did not consider single-vision distance under-correction to be an effective strategy for attenuating myopia progression (79.6 %), but prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients (63.6 ± 21.8 %). The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (20.6 %) and inadequate information (17.6 %).
While practitioner concern about myopia and the reported level of activity have increased over the last 4 years, the vast majority of eye care clinicians still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. With recent global consensus evidence-based guidelines having been published, it is hoped that this will inform the practice of myopia management in future.
2015年的一项调查发现,眼科护理从业者对近视高度关注,且报告称其活动水平较高,但绝大多数人仍为年轻近视患者开具单焦点视力矫正措施。本研究旨在4年后更新这些研究结果。
通过专业机构以八种语言在全球范围内向眼科护理从业者发放了一份基于网络的自填式问卷。问题涉及:对近视患病率上升的认知、现有策略的感知效果及此类策略的采用水平,以及不采用特定策略的原因。
在1336名受访者中,亚洲地区的关注度最高(9.0±1.6;p<0.001),澳大拉西亚地区的关注度最低(7.6±2.2;p<0.001)。亚洲的从业者也认为他们在近视控制方面的临床实践最为积极(7.7±2.3;p<0.001),北美从业者最不积极(6.3±2.9;p<0.001)。角膜塑形术被认为是控制近视最有效的方法,其次是药物治疗方法和已获批准的近视控制软性隐形眼镜(p<0.001)。尽管区域内存在显著差异,但总体而言,大多数从业者不认为单焦点近视欠矫是减缓近视进展的有效策略(79.6%),但仍将单焦点眼镜或隐形眼镜作为近视患者的主要矫正方式(63.6±21.8%)。他们不愿开具单焦点屈光矫正替代方案的主要理由是成本增加(20.6%)和信息不足(17.6%)。
虽然在过去4年里,从业者对近视的关注度和报告的活动水平有所提高,但绝大多数眼科护理临床医生仍为年轻近视患者开具单焦点视力矫正措施。鉴于最近已发布基于全球共识的循证指南,希望这将为未来的近视管理实践提供参考。