2nd Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Kraków, Poland
2nd Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Kardiol Pol. 2020 Feb 25;78(2):147-153. doi: 10.33963/KP.15070. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective method for the treatment ofcoronary artery disease (CAD) that allows for a short hospital stay and fast recovery. It has been shown that PCI is a predictor of nonattendance at cardiac rehabilitation and correlates with poor adherence to lifestyle changes.
The study was conducted to evaluate the influence of education offered during PCI‑related hospitalization on knowledge, awareness, and prevalence of self‑reported risk factors for CAD.
We collected data using a self‑designed 56‑item questionnaire. Questions assessed the knowledge of CAD risk factors and the level of their control. The maximal knowledge score was 31 points and the maximal control score, 15 points.
The study group consisted of 200 consecutive patients undergoing PCI. Patients with a history of PCI performed at least 8 weeks prior to their current hospitalization were included in the prior‑PCI group (64%), whereas the pre‑PCI group comprised patients with no history of revascularization (36%). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) knowledge score was 19 (12.5-23) points in the pre‑PCI and 21 (12.5-24) points in the prior‑PCI group (P = 0.35). The median (IQR) risk control score was 5 (4.5-7) points in the pre‑PCI and 6 (4-8) points in the prior‑PCI group (P = 0.4). There was no correlation between the level of knowledge and the actual prevalence of CAD risk factors. We found that 50% of the prior‑PCI patients did not attend any rehabilitation, which correlated with poor control of CAD risk factors (P = 0.001).
Currently used models of postprocedural education do not have an adequate effect on patient knowledge and do not bring recommended lifestyle changes.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是治疗冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的有效方法,可缩短住院时间并快速康复。研究表明,PCI 是心脏康复不依从的预测因子,并与生活方式改变的依从性差相关。
本研究旨在评估 PCI 相关住院期间提供的教育对 CAD 相关知识、意识和自我报告的 CAD 风险因素流行率的影响。
我们使用自行设计的 56 项问卷收集数据。问题评估了 CAD 风险因素的知识和控制水平。最大知识得分为 31 分,最大控制得分为 15 分。
研究组包括 200 例连续接受 PCI 的患者。既往 PCI 组(64%)纳入至少在当前住院前 8 周接受过 PCI 的患者,而无再血管化史的患者纳入 PCI 前组(36%)。PCI 前组的中位数(四分位距 [IQR])知识评分是 19(12.5-23)分,而既往 PCI 组是 21(12.5-24)分(P = 0.35)。PCI 前组的中位数(IQR)风险控制评分是 5(4.5-7)分,而既往 PCI 组是 6(4-8)分(P = 0.4)。知识水平与 CAD 风险因素的实际流行率之间无相关性。我们发现,50%的既往 PCI 患者未参加任何康复治疗,这与 CAD 风险因素控制不佳相关(P = 0.001)。
目前使用的术后教育模式对患者的知识没有足够的影响,也没有带来推荐的生活方式改变。