• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三维打印与计算机辅助工程在双侧牙槽嵴裂术前容积评估中的比较

Comparison of Three-Dimensional Printing and Computer-aided Engineering in Presurgical Volumetric Assessment of Bilateral Alveolar Clefts.

作者信息

Chen Shuxiu, Liu Bing, Liu Jing, Yin Ningbei, Wang Yongqian

机构信息

Center for Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Mar/Apr;31(2):412-415. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006011.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006011
PMID:31764559
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate 2 advanced methods for presurgical calculation of bilateral alveolar cleft defect volume using 3-dimensional (3D) printing and computer-aided engineering (CAE) software. Twelve patients with bilateral alveolar cleft (4 females, 8 males, age range 8-11 years) were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent preoperative helical computed tomography scans, and the digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) data of the computed tomography images were analyzed using 3D printing and CAE software. The 3D-printed model used a simulated graft, and graft volume was measured by water displacement. The CAE software used a subtractive method to calculate volume. Simulated graft volumes and CAE-software-derived volumes were compared using Pearson's correlation test and paired Student's t-test. The average volume of the simulated bone grafts obtained using 3D-printed models was 1.45 mL, which was lower than the CAE-software-derived mean volume of 1.52 mL. The mean calculation time using the 3D-printed model was 51.5 minutes, which was 32.1 minutes longer than the average 19.4 minutes when using CAE software. Paired Student's t-test revealed no statistically significant difference between the volumes derived from these methods. The results of this study further validated the use of 3D printing and CAE technique in bilateral alveolar defect repair. The CAE software is more cost-effective in presurgical volumetric assessment. Moreover, 3D models overcome limitations of 3D visualizations by providing tactile feedback and superior appreciation of visuospatial relationships among anatomical structures.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两种先进方法,即使用三维(3D)打印和计算机辅助工程(CAE)软件对双侧牙槽嵴裂缺损体积进行术前计算。12例双侧牙槽嵴裂患者(4例女性,8例男性,年龄范围8 - 11岁)纳入本研究。所有患者均接受术前螺旋计算机断层扫描,并使用3D打印和CAE软件分析计算机断层扫描图像的医学数字成像和通信(DICOM)数据。3D打印模型使用模拟移植物,通过排水法测量移植物体积。CAE软件使用减法计算体积。使用Pearson相关检验和配对学生t检验比较模拟移植物体积和CAE软件得出的体积。使用3D打印模型获得的模拟骨移植物平均体积为1.45 mL,低于CAE软件得出的平均体积1.52 mL。使用3D打印模型的平均计算时间为51.5分钟,比使用CAE软件时的平均19.4分钟长32.1分钟。配对学生t检验显示这些方法得出的体积之间无统计学显著差异。本研究结果进一步验证了3D打印和CAE技术在双侧牙槽嵴裂修复中的应用。CAE软件在术前体积评估中更具成本效益。此外,3D模型通过提供触觉反馈和对解剖结构之间视觉空间关系的更好理解克服了3D可视化的局限性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Three-Dimensional Printing and Computer-aided Engineering in Presurgical Volumetric Assessment of Bilateral Alveolar Clefts.三维打印与计算机辅助工程在双侧牙槽嵴裂术前容积评估中的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Mar/Apr;31(2):412-415. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006011.
2
Quick Method for Presurgical Volumetric Analysis of Alveolar Cleft Defects.牙槽嵴裂缺损术前容积分析的快速方法
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 May/Jun;31(3):821-824. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006235.
3
Volumetric Analysis of Alveolar Bone Defect Using Three-Dimensional-Printed Models Versus Computer-Aided Engineering.使用三维打印模型与计算机辅助工程对牙槽骨缺损进行体积分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Mar;28(2):383-386. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003301.
4
Evaluation of bone volume after secondary bone grafting in unilateral alveolar cleft using computer-aided engineering.使用计算机辅助工程技术评估单侧牙槽嵴裂二期植骨后的骨体积
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Nov;51(6):665-8. doi: 10.1597/13-045. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
5
Comparison of Two Methods for Presurgical Volumetric Evaluation of Alveolar Cleft Bone Defects Using Computer-Aided Engineering.应用计算机辅助工程技术对比两种术前牙槽裂骨缺损容积评估方法。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):477-481. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006930.
6
Volumetric analysis of simulated alveolar cleft defects and bone grafts using cone beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对模拟牙槽裂缺损和骨移植进行容积分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr;131(4):854-859. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818e4f.
7
Accuracy of both virtual and printed 3-dimensional models for volumetric measurement of alveolar clefts before grafting with alveolar bone compared with a validated algorithm: a preliminary investigation.与经过验证的算法相比,虚拟和打印的三维模型在牙槽骨移植前对牙槽裂进行体积测量的准确性:一项初步研究。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jan;55(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
Volumetric Analysis of Unilateral Alveolar Bone Defect Using Modified Subtraction in Older Chinese Patients.利用改良减影法对老年中国患者单侧牙槽骨缺损进行容积分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2023 May 1;34(3):e289-e293. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009209. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
9
Accurate Evaluation of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Volumetrically Assess Bone Grafting in Alveolar Cleft Patients.锥形束计算机断层扫描对牙槽嵴裂患者骨移植进行容积评估的准确性评价
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Sep;26(6):e535-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002034.
10
In-Depth Volumetric Analysis of Alveolar Cleft Defects Using Three-Dimensionally Printed Models.使用三维打印模型对牙槽裂缺损进行深入的容积分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Sep;31(6):1790-1792. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006596.