• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喜炎平注射液致不良反应严重程度的相关危险因素:倾向评分匹配分析。

Risk factors associated with the severity of adverse drug reactions by Xiyanping injection: A propensity score-matched analysis.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Haiyuncang Lane, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.

Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Haiyuncang Lane, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China; Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, China.

出版信息

J Ethnopharmacol. 2020 Mar 25;250:112424. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112424. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jep.2019.112424
PMID:31765765
Abstract

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Xiyanping injection (XYP), extraction of Andrographis paniculate (Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees, chuan xin lian), is a Chinese patent medicine approved to treat bronchitis in China. In 2017, safety incidents associated with treatment of XYP began to emerge throughout China. However, the risk factors of severity of adverse reactions by XYP remain uncertain.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To determine risk factors for the severity of XYP-associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed a total of 26,317 cases of ADRs linked to the use of XYP injection in the China National Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Information System from 2004 to 2017. Data were analyzed with respect to age, gender, ethnicity, previous ADRs, family history of ADRs, dosage specification, medication frequency specification, body weight, route of administration, herb-drug interactions (ribavirin, cefatriaxone, penicillin sodium, ambroxol hydrochloride, clindamycin, cefoxitin sodium, azithromycin, ceftazidime, amoxicillin sodium and clavulanate potassium, levofloxacin, cefazolin sodium pentahydrate, acyclovir) by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. Propensity score matching was used to compare severity of (general or serious) ADRs.

RESULTS

We included 24,911 cases of general ADRs and 1406 cases of serious ADRs. Univariate analysis identified age (p ​< ​0.001), body weight (p ​< ​0.001), route of administration (p ​= ​0.008), co-administration of XYP with ribavirin (p ​= ​0.031) as risk factors of severity of ADRs. Multivariate analysis identified XYP ​+ ​ribavirin combination (p ​= ​0.048) and age (p ​< ​0.001) as the independent risk factors. Upon propensity score matching, the variables were relatively balanced amongst the two groups of patients with general or severe ADRs, and the level of severity in patients who received treatment of XYP ​+ ​ribavirin increased (p ​= ​0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Age and co-administration of ribavirin may be potential risk factors for the severity of XYP-associated ADRs. This reminds us to pay more attention to the safety of elderly medication. Minimizing the herb-drug-interaction effects of XYP and ribavirin is a viable treatment target for healthcare professionals in managing serious ADRs amongst patients receiving XYP injection.

摘要

民族药理学相关性

喜炎平注射液(XYP)是穿心莲(Andrographis paniculata(Burm. f.)Nees,chuan xin lian)的提取物,是一种中国专利药品,在中国被批准用于治疗支气管炎。2017 年,与 XYP 治疗相关的安全事件开始在中国各地出现。然而,XYP 相关不良反应(ADR)严重程度的危险因素仍不确定。

研究目的

确定与喜炎平注射液相关的不良反应严重程度的危险因素。

材料和方法

我们分析了 2004 年至 2017 年中国国家药品不良反应监测信息系统中与喜炎平注射液使用相关的 26317 例不良反应。使用单变量分析和多变量分析分别从年龄、性别、种族、既往不良反应史、不良反应家族史、剂量规格、用药频率规格、体重、给药途径、草药-药物相互作用(利巴韦林、头孢曲松、青霉素钠、盐酸氨溴索、克林霉素、头孢西丁钠、阿奇霉素、头孢他啶、阿莫西林钠和克拉维酸钾、左氧氟沙星、头孢唑林钠五水合物、阿昔洛韦)方面分析数据。采用倾向评分匹配比较(一般或严重)不良反应的严重程度。

结果

我们纳入了 24911 例一般不良反应和 1406 例严重不良反应。单变量分析确定年龄(p<0.001)、体重(p<0.001)、给药途径(p=0.008)、喜炎平与利巴韦林联合使用(p=0.031)是不良反应严重程度的危险因素。多变量分析确定喜炎平与利巴韦林联合使用(p=0.048)和年龄(p<0.001)是独立的危险因素。在倾向评分匹配后,两组一般或严重不良反应患者的变量相对平衡,接受喜炎平与利巴韦林联合治疗的患者的严重程度增加(p=0.020)。

结论

年龄和利巴韦林联合使用可能是喜炎平相关 ADR 严重程度的潜在危险因素。这提醒我们要更加关注老年人的用药安全。尽量减少喜炎平和利巴韦林的草药-药物相互作用是医护人员管理接受喜炎平注射液治疗的患者严重 ADR 的可行治疗目标。

相似文献

1
Risk factors associated with the severity of adverse drug reactions by Xiyanping injection: A propensity score-matched analysis.喜炎平注射液致不良反应严重程度的相关危险因素:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2020 Mar 25;250:112424. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112424. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
2
Variable importance for projection (VIP) scores for analyzing the contribution of risk factors in severe adverse events to Xiyanping injection.用于分析严重不良事件中风险因素对喜炎平注射液贡献的投影变量重要性(VIP)得分。
Chin Med. 2023 Feb 13;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13020-023-00718-8.
3
Clinical features of adverse events associated with Xiyanping-Ribavirin combination: A systematic review.Xiyanping-利巴韦林联合用药不良反应的临床特征:系统评价。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2022 Jun 28;292:115076. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115076. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
4
Concomitant Medication Use With Xiyanping Injection and the Risk of Suspected Allergic Reactions: A Nested Case-Control Study Based on China's National Medical Insurance Database.喜炎平注射液的合并用药情况及疑似过敏反应风险:一项基于中国国家医保数据库的巢式病例对照研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 21;13:883407. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.883407. eCollection 2022.
5
Normative Application of Xiyanping Injection: A Systematic Review of Adverse Case Reports.喜炎平注射液的规范应用:不良病例报告的系统评价
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Nov 15;2018:4013912. doi: 10.1155/2018/4013912. eCollection 2018.
6
The effects of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees extract and diterpenoids on the CYP450 isoforms' activities, a review of possible herb-drug interaction risks.穿心莲提取物和二萜类化合物对细胞色素P450同工酶活性的影响:潜在的药草-药物相互作用风险综述
Drug Chem Toxicol. 2015;38(3):241-53. doi: 10.3109/01480545.2014.947504. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
7
Xiyanping Plus Azithromycin Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients with Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.喜炎平联合阿奇霉素治疗小儿肺炎的疗效与安全性系统评价和Meta分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Aug 29;2019:2346583. doi: 10.1155/2019/2346583. eCollection 2019.
8
Efficacy and safety of Xiyanping injection in the treatment of COVID-19: A multicenter, prospective, open-label and randomized controlled trial.喜炎平注射液治疗 COVID-19 的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Phytother Res. 2021 Aug;35(8):4401-4410. doi: 10.1002/ptr.7141. Epub 2021 May 12.
9
Safety Concerns of Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections Used in Chinese Children.中国儿童使用的中药注射剂的安全性问题
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Jun 23;2019:8310368. doi: 10.1155/2019/8310368. eCollection 2019.
10
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic herb-drug interaction of Andrographis paniculata (Nees) extract and andrographolide with etoricoxib after oral administration in rats.穿心莲提取物和穿心莲内酯与依托考昔在大鼠口服给药后的药代动力学和药效学药物相互作用。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2016 May 13;183:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of reported serious adverse drug reactions due to anti-infectives using nationwide database of Thailand.利用泰国全国性数据库开展的抗感染药物所致严重药品不良反应报告的流行病学研究
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0318597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318597. eCollection 2025.
2
Variable importance for projection (VIP) scores for analyzing the contribution of risk factors in severe adverse events to Xiyanping injection.用于分析严重不良事件中风险因素对喜炎平注射液贡献的投影变量重要性(VIP)得分。
Chin Med. 2023 Feb 13;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13020-023-00718-8.
3
Concomitant Medication Use With Xiyanping Injection and the Risk of Suspected Allergic Reactions: A Nested Case-Control Study Based on China's National Medical Insurance Database.
喜炎平注射液的合并用药情况及疑似过敏反应风险:一项基于中国国家医保数据库的巢式病例对照研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 21;13:883407. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.883407. eCollection 2022.
4
Chinese herbal injections for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A narrative review.用于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的中药注射剂:一项叙述性综述。
Integr Med Res. 2021 Dec;10(4):100778. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2021.100778. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
The ethics of COVID-19 clinical trials: New considerations in a controversial area.新冠病毒肺炎临床试验的伦理:争议领域中的新考量
Integr Med Res. 2020 Sep;9(3):100425. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100425. Epub 2020 May 15.