State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou, China.
Departement of Ophthalmology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou, China.
Curr Eye Res. 2020 Jul;45(7):827-833. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1698053. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
To evaluate the accuracy of modified Wang-Koch adjustment for intraocular lens power calculation in axial myopic eyes at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China.
Consecutive cataract patients with axial lengths (ALs) over 25.0 mm were enrolled. The accuracies of SRK/T and Holladay 1 with modified Wang-Koch AL adjustment were compared with those calculated with optimized lens constants for long eyes and lens constants from the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry. They were also compared with Barrett Universal II (Barrett) and Haigis. The median absolute error (AE), mean absolute error (MAE) and proportions of eyes with a prediction error (PE) within ±0.25 diopter (D), ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D were determined.
In total, 325 eyes from patients with a mean age of 58.62 ± 13.51 years and a mean preoperative AL of 27.65 ± 2.05 mm were included. For SRK/T, Wang-Koch adjustment did not increase the proportion of eyes within the given diopter of PE in any AL subgroup and led to worse outcomes for ALs between 27.0 mm and 30.0 mm (n = 129; = .001) compared to the method of using measured AL and optimized constant. For Holladay 1, comparison of PEs within ±0.50 D favored AL adjusted eyes in all subgroups. Moreover, the median AE of Holladay 1 with Wang-Koch adjustment in eyes with ALs between 25.0 mm and 27.0 mm was lower than that of Barrett (n = 146; = .02).
The modified Wang-Koch adjustment had better performance than constant optimization for Holladay 1 but not for SRK/T. Holladay 1 with Wang-Koch adjustment was more accurate than Barrett for ALs between 25.0 mm and 27.0 mm.
评估在中国广州中山眼科中心对轴向远视眼进行改良 Wang-Koch 眼轴调整的人工晶状体屈光度计算的准确性。
连续纳入眼轴(AL)大于 25.0mm 的白内障患者。比较 SRK/T 和 Holladay 1 联合改良 Wang-Koch AL 调整与长眼优化晶状体常数和用户组激光干涉生物测量晶状体常数的准确性,并与 Barrett Universal II(Barrett)和 Haigis 进行比较。确定中位数绝对误差(AE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和预测误差(PE)在±0.25 屈光度(D)、±0.50 D 和±1.00 D 范围内的眼数比例。
共纳入 325 只眼,患者平均年龄为 58.62±13.51 岁,平均术前 AL 为 27.65±2.05mm。对于 SRK/T,Wang-Koch 调整并没有增加任何 AL 亚组内 PE 在给定屈光度范围内的眼数比例,对于 27.0mm 至 30.0mm 的 AL(n=129; =0.001),Wang-Koch 调整与使用实测 AL 和优化常数的方法相比,结果更差。对于 Holladay 1,在所有亚组中,PE 在±0.50 D 范围内的比较都有利于调整 AL 的眼。此外,在 25.0mm 至 27.0mm AL 的眼中,Wang-Koch 调整后的 Holladay 1 的中位 AE 低于 Barrett(n=146; =0.02)。
改良 Wang-Koch 调整对于 Holladay 1 比常数优化具有更好的性能,但对于 SRK/T 则不然。在 25.0mm 至 27.0mm AL 中,Wang-Koch 调整后的 Holladay 1 比 Barrett 更准确。