• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国人眼轴向近视的改良眼轴长度调整在人工晶状体屈光力计算中的准确性。

Accuracy of Modified Axial Length Adjustment for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Chinese Axial Myopic Eyes.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou, China.

Departement of Ophthalmology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Curr Eye Res. 2020 Jul;45(7):827-833. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1698053. Epub 2019 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1080/02713683.2019.1698053
PMID:31769715
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of modified Wang-Koch adjustment for intraocular lens power calculation in axial myopic eyes at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive cataract patients with axial lengths (ALs) over 25.0 mm were enrolled. The accuracies of SRK/T and Holladay 1 with modified Wang-Koch AL adjustment were compared with those calculated with optimized lens constants for long eyes and lens constants from the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry. They were also compared with Barrett Universal II (Barrett) and Haigis. The median absolute error (AE), mean absolute error (MAE) and proportions of eyes with a prediction error (PE) within ±0.25 diopter (D), ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D were determined.

RESULTS

In total, 325 eyes from patients with a mean age of 58.62 ± 13.51 years and a mean preoperative AL of 27.65 ± 2.05 mm were included. For SRK/T, Wang-Koch adjustment did not increase the proportion of eyes within the given diopter of PE in any AL subgroup and led to worse outcomes for ALs between 27.0 mm and 30.0 mm (n = 129; = .001) compared to the method of using measured AL and optimized constant. For Holladay 1, comparison of PEs within ±0.50 D favored AL adjusted eyes in all subgroups. Moreover, the median AE of Holladay 1 with Wang-Koch adjustment in eyes with ALs between 25.0 mm and 27.0 mm was lower than that of Barrett (n = 146; = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Wang-Koch adjustment had better performance than constant optimization for Holladay 1 but not for SRK/T. Holladay 1 with Wang-Koch adjustment was more accurate than Barrett for ALs between 25.0 mm and 27.0 mm.

摘要

目的

评估在中国广州中山眼科中心对轴向远视眼进行改良 Wang-Koch 眼轴调整的人工晶状体屈光度计算的准确性。

材料和方法

连续纳入眼轴(AL)大于 25.0mm 的白内障患者。比较 SRK/T 和 Holladay 1 联合改良 Wang-Koch AL 调整与长眼优化晶状体常数和用户组激光干涉生物测量晶状体常数的准确性,并与 Barrett Universal II(Barrett)和 Haigis 进行比较。确定中位数绝对误差(AE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和预测误差(PE)在±0.25 屈光度(D)、±0.50 D 和±1.00 D 范围内的眼数比例。

结果

共纳入 325 只眼,患者平均年龄为 58.62±13.51 岁,平均术前 AL 为 27.65±2.05mm。对于 SRK/T,Wang-Koch 调整并没有增加任何 AL 亚组内 PE 在给定屈光度范围内的眼数比例,对于 27.0mm 至 30.0mm 的 AL(n=129; =0.001),Wang-Koch 调整与使用实测 AL 和优化常数的方法相比,结果更差。对于 Holladay 1,在所有亚组中,PE 在±0.50 D 范围内的比较都有利于调整 AL 的眼。此外,在 25.0mm 至 27.0mm AL 的眼中,Wang-Koch 调整后的 Holladay 1 的中位 AE 低于 Barrett(n=146; =0.02)。

结论

改良 Wang-Koch 调整对于 Holladay 1 比常数优化具有更好的性能,但对于 SRK/T 则不然。在 25.0mm 至 27.0mm AL 中,Wang-Koch 调整后的 Holladay 1 比 Barrett 更准确。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of Modified Axial Length Adjustment for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Chinese Axial Myopic Eyes.中国人眼轴向近视的改良眼轴长度调整在人工晶状体屈光力计算中的准确性。
Curr Eye Res. 2020 Jul;45(7):827-833. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1698053. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
2
Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with axial myopia.比较中国人眼轴性近视的人工晶状体计算公式。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):725-731. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.018.
3
Comparison of six methods for the intraocular lens power calculation in high myopic eyes.高度近视眼中六种人工晶状体计算公式的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;31(1):96-102. doi: 10.1177/1120672119889016. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
4
Effect of Axial Length Adjustment Methods on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Highly Myopic Eyes.轴向长度调整方法对高度近视眼中人工晶状体屈光力计算的影响。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;214:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.023. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
[Intraocular lens power calculation for high myopic eyes with cataract: comparison of three formulas].[白内障高度近视眼人工晶状体屈光度计算:三种公式的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 11;53(4):260-265. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.04.007.
6
Accuracy of Modern Intraocular Lens Formulas in Highly Myopic Eyes Implanted With Plate-Haptic Intraocular Lenses.高度近视眼植入板式襻人工晶状体后现代人工晶状体计算公式的准确性
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep;265:105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 May 3.
7
Comparison of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for a Trifocal IOL in Eyes With High Myopia.高度近视眼三焦点人工晶状体的 IOL 计算公式比较。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Aug;37(8):538-544. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210506-01. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
8
Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods.眼轴长度大于26.0毫米的眼睛的人工晶状体屈光力计算:公式与方法的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):548-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.033. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
9
Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas based on swept-source OCT biometer in cataract patients with phakic intraocular lens.基于扫频源 OCT 生物测量仪的人工晶状体计算公式在有晶状体眼白内障患者中的准确性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03605-4.
10
Accuracy and Precision of Intraocular Lens Calculations Using the New Hill-RBF Version 2.0 in Eyes With High Axial Myopia.高度近视眼中新型 Hill-RBF 版本 2.0 计算人工晶状体的准确性和精密度。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;205:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of 12 IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes.12种人工晶状体屈光力计算公式在高度近视眼中的准确性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 25;45(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03608-0.
2
Investigation of the myopic outcomes of the newer intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Korean patients with long eyes.研究长眼球的韩国患者中新型人工晶状体计算公式的近视结果。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 31;14(1):12558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63334-y.
3
Extended depth of focus IOL in eyes with different axial myopia and targeted refraction.
不同轴向近视眼的扩展景深人工晶状体与目标屈光。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03442-5.
4
Comparison of the formula accuracy for calculating multifocal intraocular lens power: a single center retrospective study in Korean patients.比较计算多焦点人工晶状体度数公式的准确性:韩国患者的单中心回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 23;14(1):4462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54889-x.
5
Biometry challenges in the longest eyes we have encountered to date.生物统计学对我们迄今所遇到的最长眼球构成挑战。
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2024 Jan 14;33:101997. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2024.101997. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Comparison of the prediction accuracy of 13 formulas in long eyes.长眼的 13 个公式的预测精度比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;261(9):2575-2583. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06060-x. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
7
Comparison of visual outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and a refractive bifocal intraocular lens in eyes with axial myopia: a prospective cohort study.轴性近视患者的衍射三焦点人工晶状体与折射双焦点人工晶状体视觉效果的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02626-1.
8
Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens.三焦点人工晶状体与旋转不对称折射型多焦点人工晶状体单眼植入术后视觉质量的对比分析
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 18;15(9):1460-1467. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.09.08. eCollection 2022.
9
Assessing Accuracy of Okulix Ray-Tracing Software in Calculating Intraocular Lens Power in the Long Cataractous Eyes.评估Okulix光线追踪软件在计算长白内障眼人工晶状体屈光度方面的准确性。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 16;34(1):67-73. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_136_20. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.