• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人基于互联网的疼痛自我管理:疼痛缓解计划的可行性和初步疗效

Internet-Based Pain Self-Management for Veterans: Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of the Pain EASE Program.

作者信息

Higgins Diana M, Buta Eugenia, Williams David A, Halat Allison, Bair Matthew J, Heapy Alicia A, Krein Sarah L, Rajeevan Haseena, Rosen Marc I, Kerns Robert D

机构信息

Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2020 Apr;20(4):357-370. doi: 10.1111/papr.12861. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/papr.12861
PMID:31778281
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a cognitive behavioral therapy-based, internet-delivered self-management program for chronic low back pain (cLBP) in veterans.

METHODS

Phase I included program development, involving expert panel and participant feedback. Phase II was a single-arm feasibility and preliminary efficacy study of the Pain e-health for Activity, Skills, and Education (Pain EASE) program. Feasibility (ie, website use, treatment credibility, satisfaction) was measured using descriptive methods. Mixed models were used to assess mean within-subject changes from baseline to 10 weeks post-baseline in pain interference (primary outcome, West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory, scale of 0 to 6), pain intensity, mood, fatigue, sleep, and depression.

RESULTS

Phase I participants (n = 15) suggested modifications including style changes, content reduction, additional "Test Your Knowledge" quizzes, and cognitive behavioral therapy skill practice monitoring form revisions for enhanced usability. In Phase II, participants (n = 58) were mostly male (93%) and White (60%), and had an average age of 55 years (standard deviation [SD] = 12) and moderate pain (mean score 5.9/10); 41 (71%) completed the post-baseline assessment. Participants (N = 58) logged on 6.1 (SD = 8.6) times over 10 weeks, and 85% reported being very or moderately satisfied with Pain EASE. Pain interference improved from a mean of 3.8 at baseline to 3.3 at 10 weeks (difference 0.5 [95% confidence interval 0.1 to 0.9], P = 0.008). Within-subject improvement also occurred for some secondary outcomes, including mood and depression symptoms.

DISCUSSION

Veterans with cLBP may benefit from technology-delivered interventions, which may also reduce pain interference. Overall, veterans found that Pain EASE, an internet-based self-management program, is feasible and satisfactory for cLBP.

摘要

目的

开发并测试一种基于认知行为疗法、通过互联网提供的针对退伍军人慢性下腰痛(cLBP)的自我管理项目的可行性和初步疗效。

方法

第一阶段包括项目开发,涉及专家小组和参与者反馈。第二阶段是针对“活动、技能与教育疼痛电子健康”(Pain EASE)项目的单组可行性和初步疗效研究。使用描述性方法测量可行性(即网站使用情况、治疗可信度、满意度)。采用混合模型评估从基线到基线后10周内疼痛干扰(主要结局,西黑文 - 耶鲁多维疼痛量表,范围为0至6)、疼痛强度、情绪、疲劳、睡眠和抑郁的受试者内平均变化。

结果

第一阶段的参与者(n = 15)建议进行修改,包括样式更改、内容精简、增加“知识测试”小测验以及修订认知行为疗法技能练习监测表以提高可用性。在第二阶段,参与者(n = 58)大多为男性(93%)和白人(60%),平均年龄55岁(标准差[SD] = 12),疼痛程度为中度(平均评分5.9/10);41名(71%)完成了基线后评估。参与者(N = 58)在10周内登录6.1次(SD = 8.6),85%的人报告对Pain EASE非常或中度满意。疼痛干扰从基线时的平均3.8改善到10周时的3.3(差值0.5[95%置信区间0.1至0.9],P = 0.008)。一些次要结局,包括情绪和抑郁症状,也出现了受试者内改善。

讨论

患有cLBP的退伍军人可能从技术提供的干预措施中受益,这也可能减少疼痛干扰。总体而言,退伍军人发现基于互联网的自我管理项目Pain EASE对cLBP是可行且令人满意的。

相似文献

1
Internet-Based Pain Self-Management for Veterans: Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of the Pain EASE Program.退伍军人基于互联网的疼痛自我管理:疼痛缓解计划的可行性和初步疗效
Pain Pract. 2020 Apr;20(4):357-370. doi: 10.1111/papr.12861. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Predictors of engagement in an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy program for veterans with chronic low back pain.预测参与基于互联网的认知行为疗法治疗慢性下背痛退伍军人的因素。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jun 17;11(6):1274-1282. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa098.
3
Interactive Voice Response-Based Self-management for Chronic Back Pain: The COPES Noninferiority Randomized Trial.基于交互式语音应答的慢性背痛自我管理:COPES非劣效性随机试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):765-773. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0223.
4
Comparison of a Single-Session Pain Management Skills Intervention With a Single-Session Health Education Intervention and 8 Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较单次疼痛管理技能干预与单次健康教育培训干预以及 8 次认知行为疗法对慢性下腰痛成人的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2113401. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13401.
5
An 8-Week Self-Administered At-Home Behavioral Skills-Based Virtual Reality Program for Chronic Low Back Pain: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Conducted During COVID-19.一项针对慢性下腰痛的 8 周自我管理家庭行为技能为基础的虚拟现实程序:在 COVID-19 期间进行的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e26292. doi: 10.2196/26292.
6
Assessing the Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of a Web-Based Self-Management Program for Chronic Noncancer Pain: Mixed Methods Study.评估基于网络的慢性非癌性疼痛自我管理项目的可行性和初步效果:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 3;11:e50747. doi: 10.2196/50747.
7
Effects of a Home-Based Telephone-Supported Physical Activity Program for Older Adult Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain.基于家庭的电话支持的体育活动方案对慢性腰痛老年退伍军人的影响。
Phys Ther. 2018 May 1;98(5):369-380. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy026.
8
Cooperative pain education and self-management (COPES): study design and protocol of a randomized non-inferiority trial of an interactive voice response-based self-management intervention for chronic low back pain.合作性疼痛教育与自我管理(COPES):一项针对慢性下腰痛的基于交互式语音应答的自我管理干预随机非劣效性试验的研究设计与方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 16;17:85. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0924-z.
9
Internet Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Painful Chronic Pancreatitis: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.互联网认知行为疗法治疗慢性胰腺炎疼痛:一项初步可行性随机对照试验。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 18;12(6):e00373. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000373.
10
Aging Back Clinics-a Geriatric Syndrome Approach to Treating Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults: Results of a Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial.老年回春诊所——一种治疗老年人慢性下腰痛的老年综合征方法:初步随机对照试验结果。
Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):274-290. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz179.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement in Digital Self-management Interventions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review.参与慢性疼痛的数字自我管理干预措施:一项系统综述。
Clin J Pain. 2025 Jun 1;41(6):e1289. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001289.
2
Chronic Pain Self-Management Strategies for Older Adults: An Integrative Review.老年人慢性疼痛自我管理策略:一项综合综述
Life (Basel). 2024 May 30;14(6):707. doi: 10.3390/life14060707.
3
Codéveloppement d'un programme d'autogestion de la douleur chronique en ligne: un projet de recherche basé sur la conception et axé sur l'engagement des patients.
线上慢性疼痛自我管理项目的共同开发:一项基于设计并以患者参与为重点的研究项目。
Can J Pain. 2024 Jan 12;8(1):2302487. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2024.2302487. eCollection 2024.
4
Behavioral Health, Telemedicine, and Opportunities for Improving Access.行为健康、远程医疗和改善获取机会。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022 Dec;26(12):919-926. doi: 10.1007/s11916-022-01096-w. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
5
If you personalize it, will they use it?: Self-reported and observed use of a tailored, internet-based pain self-management program.如果个性化,他们会使用吗?:自我报告和观察使用定制的基于互联网的疼痛自我管理计划。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 May 26;12(5):693-701. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab165.
6
eHealth Interventions to Support Self-Management in People With Musculoskeletal Disorders, "eHealth: It's TIME"-A Scoping Review.电子健康干预措施在支持肌肉骨骼疾病患者自我管理中的应用:“电子健康:是时候了”-系统评价。
Phys Ther. 2022 Apr 1;102(4). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab307.
7
Development of an internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy program for use in combination with exercise therapy and education by patients at increased risk of chronic pain following total knee arthroplasty.开发一种通过互联网提供的认知行为疗法程序,供全膝关节置换术后慢性疼痛风险增加的患者与运动疗法和教育相结合使用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):1151. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07177-7.
8
Coexisting Substance Use Disorder and Chronic Pain During COVID-19.新冠疫情期间并存的物质使用障碍和慢性疼痛
Pain Manag Nurs. 2022 Feb;23(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Sep 6.