Costa Bruno Gonçalves Galdino da, Silva Kelly Samara da, Silveira Pablo Magno da, Berria Juliane, Machado André Ribeiro, Petroski Edio Luiz
Núcleo de Pesquisa em Atividade Física e Saúde - Florianópolis (SC), Brasil.
Departamento de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Florianópolis (SC), Brasil.
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2019 Nov 25;22:e190065. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720190065. eCollection 2019.
This study evaluated the effect of an intervention on the engagement in physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) of sixth to ninth grade students during school-time, physical education (PE) classes, and recesses at two public schools in Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
Schools were divided into control and experimental groups. Participants wore accelerometers during school-time, and PA and SB were estimated for school-time, PE classes and recesses at the baseline and after the intervention. The intervention was composed of four components: changes were made in the PE classes, including giving instruction to teachers; sports equipment was made available for use during recesses; educational sessions on the format of classes were conducted; folders and posters were distributed. Data was analyzed using an Analysis of Covariance for repeated measures comparing baseline data with post intervention data, and for independent samples when comparing control and intervention groups.
A low proportion of engagement in PA and a large engagement in SB was observed on the baseline. PA decreased in the intervention group during PE classes, while it increased in the control group with regard to school-time, PE classes, and recess. The intervention group accumulated more SB during school-time and PE classes after the intervention, while a decrease in the control group's SB during school-time was observed.
The intervention was not effective in increasing PA or decreasing SB. Environmental and school's organizational factors impact how interventions are conducted, and should be considered beforehand.
本研究评估了一项干预措施对巴西南卡罗来纳州弗洛里亚诺波利斯市两所公立学校六至九年级学生在上课时间、体育课和课间休息期间身体活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)参与情况的影响。
学校被分为对照组和实验组。参与者在上课时间佩戴加速度计,并在基线期和干预后评估上课时间、体育课和课间休息期间的身体活动和久坐行为。干预措施由四个部分组成:体育课做出改变,包括对教师进行指导;课间休息时提供体育器材供使用;开展关于课程形式的教育课程;分发文件夹和海报。使用重复测量协方差分析对基线数据与干预后数据进行比较,并在比较对照组和干预组时对独立样本进行分析。
在基线期观察到身体活动参与比例较低,久坐行为参与度较高。干预组在体育课期间身体活动减少,而对照组在上课时间、体育课和课间休息时身体活动增加。干预后,干预组在上课时间和体育课期间久坐行为增多,而对照组在上课时间的久坐行为减少。
该干预措施在增加身体活动或减少久坐行为方面无效。环境和学校组织因素会影响干预措施的实施方式,应事先予以考虑。