Hubei Subsurface Multi-scale Imaging Key Laboratory, Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Hubei Subsurface Multi-scale Imaging Key Laboratory, Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 10;707:135606. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135606. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
Since the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission was started in 2002, a variety of spatial products have been made available to further understanding of mass redistribution in the Earth system. Two such mascon (mass concentration) solutions were developed by the Center for Space Research (CSR-M) and the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL-M), which offers significantly improved spatial localization and more accurate amplitude measurements of changes in recovered terrestrial Total Water Storage (TWS). However, it is difficult to validate GRACE-derived TWS mascons due to the lack of independent measurements of water storage in various forms at larger scales.In this study, we present a simple framework to evaluate GRACE mascon products based on in-situ GPS measurements from the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) in China. We found that the mascons show a more pronounced spatial difference in TWS distribution and highlight more details as compared to smoother results from empirical post-processing filtering applied to spherical harmonics (SH) data. The prediction of vertical displacements from CSR-M and JLP-M is closer to GPS than that from SH. The residual analysis showed the reductions in WRMS (weighted root-mean-squares) from the GPS minus the CSR-M average were greater than those for JPL-M in 41 GPS stations, and the scaling factors from CLM4.0 used in JPL-M-sf had few improvements with respect to agreement with GPS measurements. Our findings indicated CSR-M solutions were more consistent with in-situ observations and more in line with actual surface mass transport in the YRB. These findings also suggested that when using GRACE mascons to detect local TWS changes or when combining GRACE-derived data with GPS-observed displacement to estimate crustal response to loadings, users should note the contributions from effects of load signal sources from atmospheric, non-tidal ocean, and difference sensitivity kernels on differences between TWS from satellite-based and in-situ observations.
自 2002 年开始,重力恢复和气候实验 (GRACE) 卫星任务已经产生了多种空间产品,这些产品进一步促进了对地球系统中质量重新分布的理解。其中两个质量集中 (mascon) 解决方案是由太空研究中心 (CSR-M) 和美国宇航局喷气推进实验室 (JPL-M) 开发的,它们提供了对恢复的陆地总水量 (TWS) 变化的空间定位和更准确的幅度测量的显著改善。然而,由于缺乏各种形式的大规模储水的独立测量,很难验证 GRACE 衍生的 TWS mascons。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个简单的框架,基于中国长江流域 (YRB) 的现场 GPS 测量来评估 GRACE mascon 产品。我们发现,与应用于球谐函数 (SH) 数据的经验后处理滤波得到的更平滑的结果相比,mascon 显示出 TWS 分布的空间差异更加明显,并且突出了更多细节。CSR-M 和 JLP-M 的垂直位移预测比 SH 更接近 GPS。残差分析表明,在 41 个 GPS 站中,GPS 减去 CSR-M 平均值的 WRMS(加权均方根)减少量大于 JPL-M,并且 JPL-M-sf 中使用的 CLM4.0 缩放因子在与 GPS 测量的一致性方面几乎没有改进。我们的研究结果表明,CSR-M 解决方案与现场观测更为一致,与 YRB 实际表面质量传输更为一致。这些结果还表明,当使用 GRACE mascons 检测局部 TWS 变化时,或者当将 GRACE 衍生数据与 GPS 观测的位移结合起来以估计地壳对负荷的响应时,用户应该注意大气、非潮汐海洋和差异灵敏度核对卫星观测和现场观测之间 TWS 差异的影响。