Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG, Geleen, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;179(3):677-685. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05495-3. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
The Stop&Go study randomized patients with advanced breast cancer to intermittent (two times four) or continuous (eight subsequent cycles) first- and second-line chemotherapy.
QoL was measured with RAND-36 questionnaires every 12 weeks. The primary objective was to estimate differences in changes from baseline between intermittent and continuous treatment. An effect size of 0.5 SD (5 points) was considered clinically meaningful.
A total of 398 patients were included with a median follow-up of 11.4 months (IQR 5.6-22.2). Mean physical QoL baseline scores were 38.0 resp. 38.2, and mental scores 45.0 resp. 42.4 for intermittent and continuous treatment. Physical QoL declined linearly in the intermittent arm causing a clinically meaningful difference of 5.40 points at 24 months (p < 0.001), while scores in the continuous arm stabilized after a small decline of ± 3.4 points at 12 months. Conversely, mental QoL was fairly stable and even improved with 1.58 (p = 0.005) and 2.48 points (p < 0.001) at 12 months for intermittent and continuous treatment, respectively. When comparing arms for both components in changes from baseline, the maximum differences were 2.46 (p = 0.101) and 1.95 points (p = 0.182) for physical and mental scores, both measured at 30 months and in favor of continuous treatment.
Intermittent first- and second-line chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer showed a trend for worse impact on QoL compared to continuous chemotherapy, with neither significant nor meaningful differences in course. We recommend prescribing chemotherapy continuously until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Trial registration EudraCT 2010-021519-18; BOOG 2010-02.
Stop&Go 研究将晚期乳腺癌患者随机分为间歇性(两次四次)或连续性(连续 8 个周期)一线和二线化疗。
每 12 周使用 RAND-36 问卷测量 QoL。主要目的是估计间歇性和连续性治疗之间从基线变化的差异。0.5 SD(5 分)的效应大小被认为具有临床意义。
共纳入 398 例患者,中位随访时间为 11.4 个月(IQR 5.6-22.2)。间歇性和连续性治疗的基线时平均生理 QoL 评分分别为 38.0 和 38.2,心理评分分别为 45.0 和 42.4。间歇性治疗组的生理 QoL 呈线性下降,导致 24 个月时具有临床意义的 5.40 分差异(p < 0.001),而连续性治疗组在 12 个月时下降约 3.4 分后稳定。相反,心理 QoL 相对稳定,间歇性和连续性治疗组在 12 个月时分别提高 1.58 分(p = 0.005)和 2.48 分(p < 0.001)。比较两组从基线开始的变化,30 个月时,在生理评分(p = 0.101)和心理评分(p = 0.182)上的最大差异分别为 2.46 分和 1.95 分,均有利于连续性治疗。
与连续化疗相比,HER2 阴性晚期乳腺癌患者的间歇性一线和二线化疗显示出对 QoL 产生负面影响的趋势,但差异无统计学意义,也无临床意义。我们建议在疾病进展或无法耐受毒性时连续开具化疗药物。试验注册 EudraCT 2010-021519-18;BOOG 2010-02。