Fine J D, Johnson L
Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama, Birmingham School of Medicine 35294.
Arch Dermatol. 1988 Nov;124(11):1669-72.
Although, as yet, there is no specific treatment of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) simplex, anecdotal reports suggest the possible efficacy of one of the newer topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, bufexamac. To determine whether bufexamac has any role in the management of this disease, a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial was undertaken with ten patients (nine, Weber-Cockayne variant; one, generalized EB simplex). Each of the two preparations was applied four times daily during the 2 four-week treatment periods. Weekly assessments included counts of blisters, crusts, and erosions, and assessments of alterations in cutaneous pain, healing times, and activity times before further blister formation. Although considerable variability in individual responses was noted, no significant difference was detectable between the active drug and its matched placebo. On the basis of these findings, it was concluded that 5% topical bufexamac is ineffective in the treatment of EB simplex.
尽管目前尚无针对单纯性大疱性表皮松解症(EB)的特异性治疗方法,但轶事报道表明,一种新型外用非甾体抗炎药布非他胺可能有效。为确定布非他胺在该病治疗中是否有作用,对10例患者(9例为韦伯-科凯恩型;1例为泛发性单纯性EB)进行了一项双盲安慰剂对照交叉临床试验。在两个为期4周的治疗期内,两种制剂均每日外用4次。每周评估包括水疱、痂皮和糜烂的计数,以及皮肤疼痛、愈合时间和进一步形成水疱前的活动时间变化的评估。尽管观察到个体反应存在相当大的差异,但活性药物与其匹配的安慰剂之间未检测到显著差异。基于这些发现,得出结论:5%外用布非他胺治疗单纯性EB无效。