Chiu Ryan G, Murphy Blake E, Rosenberg David M, Zhu Amy Q, Mehta Ankit I
J Neurosurg. 2019 Nov 29;133(6):1939-1947. doi: 10.3171/2019.9.JNS191847. Print 2020 Dec 1.
Much of the current discourse surrounding healthcare reform in the United States revolves around the role of the profit motive in medical care. However, there currently exists a paucity of literature evaluating the effect of for-profit hospital ownership status on neurological and neurosurgical care. The purpose of this study was to compare inpatient mortality, operation rates, length of stay, and hospital charges between private nonprofit and for-profit hospitals in the treatment of intracranial hemorrhage.
This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Primary outcomes, including all-cause inpatient mortality, operative status, patient disposition, hospital length of stay, total hospital charges, and per-day hospital charges, were assessed for patients discharged with a primary diagnosis of intracranial (epidural, subdural, subarachnoid, or intraparenchymal) hemorrhage, while controlling for baseline demographics, comorbidities, and interhospital differences via propensity score matching. Subgroup analyses by hemorrhage type were then performed, using the same methodology.
Of 155,977 unique hospital discharges included in this study, 133,518 originated from private nonprofit hospitals while the remaining 22,459 were from for-profit hospitals. After propensity score matching, mortality rates were higher in for-profit centers, at 14.50%, compared with 13.31% at nonprofit hospitals (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.18; p = 0.040). Surgical operation rates were also similar (25.38% vs 24.42%; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91-1.02; p = 0.181). Of note, nonprofit hospitals appeared to be more intensive, with intracranial pressure monitor placement occurring in 2.13% of patients compared with 1.47% in for-profit centers (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.88; p < 0.001). Discharge disposition was also similar, except for higher rates of absconding at for-profit hospitals (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12-2.27; p = 0.018). Length of stay was greater among for-profit hospitals (mean ± SD: 7.46 ± 11.91 vs 6.50 ± 8.74 days, p < 0.001), as were total hospital charges ($141,141.40 ± $218,364.40 vs $84,863.54 ± $136,874.71 [USD], p < 0.001). These findings remained similar even after segregating patients by subgroup analysis by hemorrhage type.
For-profit hospitals are associated with higher inpatient mortality, lengths of stay, and hospital charges compared with their nonprofit counterparts.
当前美国医疗改革的许多讨论都围绕着逐利动机在医疗保健中的作用。然而,目前评估营利性医院所有权状况对神经科和神经外科护理影响的文献很少。本研究的目的是比较私立非营利性医院和营利性医院在治疗颅内出血时的住院死亡率、手术率、住院时间和医院收费情况。
这项回顾性队列研究利用了国家住院样本(NIS)数据库中的数据。对以颅内(硬膜外、硬膜下、蛛网膜下或脑实质内)出血为主要诊断出院的患者,评估其主要结局,包括全因住院死亡率、手术状态、患者出院情况、住院时间、医院总收费和每日医院收费,同时通过倾向得分匹配控制基线人口统计学、合并症和医院间差异。然后使用相同方法按出血类型进行亚组分析。
本研究纳入的155,977例独特的医院出院病例中,133,518例来自私立非营利性医院,其余22,459例来自营利性医院。倾向得分匹配后,营利性中心的死亡率更高,为14.50%,而非营利性医院为13.31%(相对风险1.09,95%置信区间1.00 - 1.18;p = 0.040)。手术率也相似(25.38%对24.42%;相对风险0.96,95%置信区间0.91 - 1.02;p = 0.181)。值得注意的是,非营利性医院似乎治疗更密集,2.13%的患者进行了颅内压监测,而营利性中心为1.47%(相对风险0.69,95%置信区间0.54 - 0.88;p < 0.001)。出院情况也相似,但营利性医院的潜逃率更高(相对风险1.59,95%置信区间1.12 - 2.27;p = 0.018)。营利性医院的住院时间更长(平均值±标准差:7.46±11.91天对6.50±8.74天,p < 0.001),医院总收费也更高(141,141.40美元±218,364.40美元对84,863.54美元±136,874.71美元[美元],p < 0.001)。即使按出血类型进行亚组分析对患者进行分类后,这些结果仍然相似。
与非营利性医院相比,营利性医院的住院死亡率、住院时间和医院收费更高。