Alzerwi Nasser A N
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Ministry of Education, P. O. Box 66, Al-Majmaah 11952, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Emerg Med Int. 2023 Aug 11;2023:5616007. doi: 10.1155/2023/5616007. eCollection 2023.
The inferior vena cava (IVC) and the abdominal aorta (AA) are two important blood vessels located in the abdomen. The outcomes of such injuries rely heavily on the experience, expertise, and resources available at the hospital where the patient is treated. However, our current understanding of the potential impact of the hospital profit and teaching status on surgical outcomes in the context of traumatic injuries to the IVC and AA remains limited, making it important to investigate the potential association between these hospital characteristics and patient outcomes to enhance the quality of care and optimize treatment strategies.
This study aimed to compare demographics, trauma characteristics, and outcomes between nonprofit status (NPSH) and for-profit hospital status (FPSH), as well as among community hospitals (CHs), nonteaching hospitals (NTHs), and university hospitals (UHs), in patients with severe abdominal trauma and abdominal aorta injury (AAI), inferior vena cava injury (IVCI), and both (AAI + IVCI).
Demographics, trauma, and outcome measures associated with AAI, IVCI, and AAI + IVCI were compared between the different profit and teaching status groups using NTDB. Multivariate regression was used to identify independent factors associated with death under care (DUC).
In the 2017 NTDB-RDS, 1,479 patients met the inclusion criteria, resulting in an overall incidence of 0.17% for AAI, IVCI, and AAI + IVCI after severe abdominal trauma. More patients died under care in the FPSH group than in the NPSH group (nonprofit vs. for-profit: 60.3% vs. 47.2%; < 0.001). The results indicated that FPSH independently affected DUC. NTH had no significant effect on DUC; although the in-hospital complication rate varied with NTH, no independent association was observed.
The study findings demonstrated that in patients with severe abdominal trauma, including injuries to AAI, IVCI, or both (AAI + IVCI), the profit status of hospitals, rather than the teaching status, had a substantial influence on DUC. Future studies should examine differences in the volume of cases and levels of trauma centers to better understand how to improve patient outcomes in FPSH.
下腔静脉(IVC)和腹主动脉(AA)是位于腹部的两条重要血管。此类损伤的治疗结果在很大程度上取决于患者接受治疗的医院所具备的经验、专业知识和资源。然而,我们目前对于医院盈利状况和教学地位在IVC和AA创伤情况下对外科手术结果的潜在影响的理解仍然有限,因此研究这些医院特征与患者治疗结果之间的潜在关联对于提高护理质量和优化治疗策略至关重要。
本研究旨在比较非营利性医院(NPSH)和营利性医院(FPSH)以及社区医院(CHs)、非教学医院(NTHs)和大学医院(UHs)中严重腹部创伤合并腹主动脉损伤(AAI)、下腔静脉损伤(IVCI)以及两者皆有(AAI + IVCI)的患者的人口统计学特征、创伤特点和治疗结果。
使用国家创伤数据库(NTDB)比较不同盈利和教学地位组之间与AAI、IVCI和AAI + IVCI相关的人口统计学、创伤和治疗结果指标。采用多因素回归分析确定与护理期间死亡(DUC)相关的独立因素。
在2017年NTDB - 研究数据集(RDS)中,1479例患者符合纳入标准,严重腹部创伤后AAI、IVCI和AAI + IVCI的总体发生率为0.17%。FPSH组护理期间死亡的患者比NPSH组更多(非营利性与营利性:60.3%对47.2%;P < 0.001)。结果表明FPSH独立影响DUC。NTH对DUC无显著影响;尽管住院并发症发生率因NTH而异,但未观察到独立关联。
研究结果表明,在严重腹部创伤患者中,包括AAI、IVCI或两者皆有(AAI + IVCI)的损伤,医院的盈利状况而非教学地位对DUC有重大影响。未来的研究应检查病例数量和创伤中心水平的差异,以更好地了解如何改善FPSH中的患者治疗结果。