Department of Orthodontics, UNOPAR-University of North Paraná, Londrina, Brazil.
Department of Orthodontics, UNOPAR-University of North Paraná, Londrina, Brazil.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Dec;156(6):758-766. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.12.020.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent to which different types of orthodontic appliances influence the hiring process of an individual applying for a customer service position.
A total of 7 images were created for 2 adult models: 1 male and 1 female. One image was produced without orthodontic appliances, and 6 simulated the use of orthodontic appliances, including a conventional metallic appliance with a gray elastic ligature, a conventional metallic appliance with blue elastic ligature, a conventional appliance with a transparent elastic ligature, a self-ligating metal appliance, a self-ligating esthetic appliance, and a clear aligner. A photo album was designed for each model and delivered, along with a questionnaire, to individuals in charge of job interviews and hiring. These evaluators included 236 individuals, divided into 4 groups according to age and gender: males between 18-35 years (M), males over 35 years (M > 35), females between 18-35 years (F), and females over 35 years (F > 35). The evaluators quantified the chance of hiring the models using a Visual Analogue Scale. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the evaluators according to gender and age. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the models according to gender. The Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc tests were used to compare the appliances according to design. A 5% significance level was used for all tests.
The clear aligner group showed the highest likelihood of being hired, followed by the group without orthodontic appliances, the groups with esthetic appliances (ie, conventional appliance with a transparent elastic ligature, and self-ligating esthetic appliance), and the groups with metallic appliances (ie, self-ligating metal appliance, conventional metallic appliance with gray elastic ligature, and conventional metallic appliance with blue elastic ligature).
Assuming all other qualifications of the applicants are equivalent, the use of an orthodontic appliance may influence job interviews. The better the esthetics of the appliance, the higher the likelihood of the individual being hired.
本研究旨在评估不同类型的正畸矫治器对个体申请客户服务职位的招聘过程的影响程度。
为 2 名成年模特(1 名男性和 1 名女性)创建了总共 7 张图像:1 张没有正畸矫治器的图像和 6 张模拟使用正畸矫治器的图像,包括带有灰色弹性结扎丝的传统金属矫治器、带有蓝色弹性结扎丝的传统金属矫治器、带有透明弹性结扎丝的传统矫治器、自锁金属矫治器、自锁美观矫治器和透明矫治器。为每个模型设计了一个相册,并与问卷一起交付给负责面试和招聘的个人。这些评估者包括 236 人,根据年龄和性别分为 4 组:18-35 岁的男性(M)、35 岁以上的男性(M>35)、18-35 岁的女性(F)和 35 岁以上的女性(F>35)。评估者使用视觉模拟量表量化招聘模特的机会。使用曼-惠特尼检验比较性别和年龄的评估者。使用 Wilcoxon 检验比较性别间的模型。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Dunn 事后检验比较设计间的矫治器。所有检验均使用 5%的显著性水平。
透明矫治器组被录用的可能性最高,其次是无正畸矫治器组、美观矫治器组(即带透明弹性结扎丝的传统矫治器和自锁美观矫治器)和金属矫治器组(即自锁金属矫治器、带灰色弹性结扎丝的传统金属矫治器和带蓝色弹性结扎丝的传统金属矫治器)。
假设申请人的其他资格都相同,使用正畸矫治器可能会影响面试。矫治器的美观性越好,个体被录用的可能性就越高。