• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正颌-正畸联合治疗Ⅱ类不对称畸形:疗效及影响因素。

Surgical-orthodontic treatment for class II asymmetry: outcome and influencing factors.

机构信息

Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Craniofacial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54317-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-54317-5
PMID:31784585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6884499/
Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcome of bimaxillary surgery for class II asymmetry and find the influencing factors for residual asymmetry. Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 30 adults who had bimaxillary surgery were acquired, and midline and contour landmarks of soft tissue and teeth were identified to assess treatment changes and outcome of facial asymmetry. The postoperative positional asymmetry of each osteotomy segment was also measured. After surgery, the facial midline asymmetry of the mandible, chin, and lower incisors improved significantly (all p < 0.01). However, the residual chin deviation remained as high as 2.64 ± 1.80 mm, and the influencing factors were residual shift asymmetry of the mandible (p < 0.001), chin (p < 0.001), and ramus (p = 0.001). The facial contour asymmetry was not significantly improved after surgery, and the influencing factors were the initial contour asymmetry (p < 0.001), and the residual ramus roll (p < 0.001) or yaw (p < 0.01) asymmetry. The results showed that bimaxillary surgery significantly improved midline but not contour symmetry. The postoperative midline and contour asymmetry was mainly affected by the residual shift and rotational jaw asymmetry respectively.

摘要

本研究旨在评估双颌手术治疗 II 类不对称的治疗效果,并找出残留不对称的影响因素。对 30 例接受双颌手术的成年人进行锥形束 CT 扫描,确定软组织和牙齿的中线和轮廓标志,以评估面部不对称的治疗变化和结果。还测量了每个截骨段术后的位置不对称性。术后,下颌、颏和下切牙的面部中线不对称性显著改善(均 p<0.01)。然而,颏部的残留偏差仍高达 2.64±1.80mm,影响因素为下颌(p<0.001)、颏(p<0.001)和髁突(p=0.001)的残留移位不对称。术后面部轮廓不对称无明显改善,影响因素为初始轮廓不对称(p<0.001)和残留髁突滚转(p<0.001)或偏斜(p<0.01)不对称。结果表明,双颌手术显著改善了中线,但没有改善轮廓对称性。术后中线和轮廓不对称主要受残留的颌骨移位和旋转不对称影响。

相似文献

1
Surgical-orthodontic treatment for class II asymmetry: outcome and influencing factors.正颌-正畸联合治疗Ⅱ类不对称畸形:疗效及影响因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54317-5.
2
Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study.双颌手术治疗 III 类畸形后面部不对称的部位和严重程度:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 23;28(6):334. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05729-9.
3
Long-term outcomes of bimaxillary surgery for treatment of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity using surgery-first approach.采用先手术方法治疗不对称性骨骼 III 类畸形的双颌手术的长期疗效。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1685-1693. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2603-y. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
4
Predicted versus executed surgical orthognathic treatment.预测与执行的正颌外科治疗。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;41(7):547-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
5
Enhanced Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Skeletal Class III Facial Asymmetry by 3-Dimensional Surgical Simulation.三维手术模拟改善骨骼Ⅲ类面部不对称患者的手术效果
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 May;76(5):1073-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
6
Facial asymmetry outcome of orthognathic surgery in mild craniofacial microsomia compared to non-syndromic class II asymmetry.轻度颅面骨发育不全与非综合征 II 类不对称相比的正颌手术后面部不对称结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 28;28(9):502. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05899-6.
7
Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry.下颌前突伴或不伴不对称患者矢状劈开下颌骨截骨术后颞下颌关节和下颌升支的变化。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):821-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 14.
8
Treatment outcome of bimaxillary surgery for asymmetric skeletal class II deformity.双颌手术治疗不对称性骨骼 II 类畸形的治疗效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):623-632. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2462-6. Epub 2018 May 4.
9
Severe Class II malocclusion with facial asymmetry treated with intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy and LeFort I osteotomy.采用口内垂直矢状劈开下颌升支截骨术和LeFort I型截骨术治疗严重II类错牙合伴面部不对称。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):809-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.11.026.
10
Treatment of severe facial asymmetry using virtual three-dimensional planning and a "surgery first" protocol.使用虚拟三维规划和“手术优先”方案治疗严重面部不对称。
J Clin Orthod. 2013 Aug;47(8):471-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Dental Midline Shift Is Not a Predictor of the Side of Shorter Hemimandible: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Diagnostic Study.临床牙中线偏移并非较短半侧下颌骨一侧的预测指标:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描诊断研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 13;15(2):161. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020161.
2
Facial asymmetry outcome of orthognathic surgery in mild craniofacial microsomia compared to non-syndromic class II asymmetry.轻度颅面骨发育不全与非综合征 II 类不对称相比的正颌手术后面部不对称结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 28;28(9):502. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05899-6.
3
Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment outcome of bimaxillary surgery for asymmetric skeletal class II deformity.双颌手术治疗不对称性骨骼 II 类畸形的治疗效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):623-632. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2462-6. Epub 2018 May 4.
2
Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.正畸和正颌外科患者的下颌不对称及其相关因素。
Angle Orthod. 2018 Sep;88(5):545-551. doi: 10.2319/111517-785.1. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
3
The genial tubercle: A prospective novel landmark for the diagnosis of mandibular asymmetry.
双颌手术治疗 III 类畸形后面部不对称的部位和严重程度:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 23;28(6):334. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05729-9.
4
Treatment outcome and long-term stability of orthognathic surgery for facial asymmetry: A systematic review and meta-analysis.正颌手术治疗面部不对称的疗效及长期稳定性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Korean J Orthod. 2024 Mar 25;54(2):89-107. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.194. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
5
[Diagnostic and treatment alternatives for the correction of facial asymmetries: a literature review].[面部不对称矫正的诊断与治疗选择:文献综述]
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2022 Mar 30;10(1):e098. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-1001-2022-098. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
6
Is the pattern of mandibular asymmetry in mild craniofacial microsomia comparable to non-syndromic class II asymmetry?轻度颅面骨发育不全的下颌骨不对称模式是否与非综合征性 II 类不对称相似?
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4603-4613. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04429-6. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
颏结节:一种用于诊断下颌不对称的前瞻性新标志。
Korean J Orthod. 2017 Jan;47(1):50-58. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.1.50. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
4
Mandibular Contouring During Orthognathic Surgery Using the Modified Hunsuck Technique.正颌手术中使用改良Hunsuck技术进行下颌轮廓塑形
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jan;28(1):239-240. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003165.
5
Lip line changes in Class III facial asymmetry patients after orthodontic camouflage treatment, one-jaw surgery, and two-jaw surgery: A preliminary study.正畸掩饰治疗、单颌手术和双颌手术后Ⅲ类面部不对称患者的唇线变化:一项初步研究。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Mar;87(2):239-245. doi: 10.2319/033016-254.1. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
6
A new classification of mandibular asymmetry and evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion.下颌不对称的新分类及Ⅲ类错牙合畸形外科正畸治疗效果评估
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;44(6):676-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
Three-dimensional analysis of hard and soft tissue changes in patients with facial asymmetry undergoing 2-jaw surgery.接受双颌手术的面部不对称患者软硬组织变化的三维分析。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Sep;120(3):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
8
Cone-beam computed tomography based evaluation of rotational patterns of dentofacial structures in skeletal Class III deformity with mandibular asymmetry.基于锥形束计算机断层扫描对伴有下颌不对称的骨性III类错畸形中牙颌面结构旋转模式的评估
Korean J Orthod. 2015 Jul;45(4):153-63. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.153. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
9
Asymmetric mandibular prognathism: outcome, stability and patient satisfaction after BSSO surgery. A retrospective study.不对称下颌前突:双侧矢状劈开截骨术治疗后的结果、稳定性及患者满意度。一项回顾性研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;42(8):1735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
10
Three-dimensional investigation of facial surface asymmetries in skeletal malocclusion patients before and after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery.正畸治疗联合正颌手术前后骨骼性错牙合患者面部表面不对称的三维研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Mar;75(2):85-95. doi: 10.1007/s00056-013-0200-x. Epub 2014 Mar 2.