Dunn D L, Priest B P, Condie R M
Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
Arch Surg. 1988 Nov;123(11):1389-93. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400350103016.
Both monoclonal antibody (MAb) and polyclonal antibody (PAb) directed against the shared core/lipid A region of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (endotoxin) provide protection during experimental gram-negative bacterial sepsis. Although these preparations have not been compared, clinical trials administering either preparation to septic patients have been instituted. The core/lipid A region of LPS represents an antigenic domain common to many, if not all, gram-negative microbes, and thus represents an ideal target site for antibody binding. We sought to determine (1) the protective capacity of similarly reactive IgG anti-core LPS/lipid A MAbs and PAbs, (2) whether the timing of administration was important, and (3) whether either would act additively with antimicrobial agents. Antibody was administered intravenously to outbred mice, and Escherichia coli 0111:B4 was then administered intravenously or intraperitoneally with hemoglobin. Monoclonal antibodies and PAbs were equally protective, and protection was maximized by pretreatment, although the effect extended to four hours after bacterial challenge. Both MAbs and PAbs acted in concert with gentamicin hydrochloride to further reduce lethality. We concluded that MAbs and PAbs were equally protective and that clinical utility may eventually be dictated by ease and cost of antibody production.
针对脂多糖(LPS,即内毒素)的共同核心/脂质A区域的单克隆抗体(MAb)和多克隆抗体(PAb)在实验性革兰氏阴性菌败血症期间均具有保护作用。尽管尚未对这些制剂进行比较,但已开展了将这两种制剂之一给予败血症患者的临床试验。LPS的核心/脂质A区域代表了许多(如果不是所有)革兰氏阴性微生物共有的抗原结构域,因此是抗体结合的理想靶位点。我们试图确定:(1)反应性相似的抗核心LPS/脂质A IgG单克隆抗体和多克隆抗体的保护能力;(2)给药时间是否重要;(3)这两种抗体是否会与抗菌剂产生相加作用。将抗体静脉注射给远交系小鼠,然后将大肠杆菌0111:B4与血红蛋白一起静脉内或腹腔内给药。单克隆抗体和多克隆抗体具有同等的保护作用,预处理可使保护作用最大化,尽管这种作用在细菌攻击后4小时仍存在。单克隆抗体和多克隆抗体均与盐酸庆大霉素协同作用,进一步降低致死率。我们得出结论,单克隆抗体和多克隆抗体具有同等的保护作用,其临床应用最终可能取决于抗体生产的难易程度和成本。