Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD, Delft, the Netherlands.
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD, Delft, the Netherlands; Co van Ledden-Hulsebosch Center for Forensic Science and Medicine, Science Park Building 904, 1098XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Jan;306:110060. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110060. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
In order to investigate potential causal relations between the shaking of infants and injuries, biomechanical studies compare brain and skull dynamic behavior during shaking to injury thresholds. However, performing shaking tolerance research on infants, either in vivo or ex vivo, is extremely difficult, if not impossible. Therefore, infant injury thresholds are usually estimated by scaling or extrapolating adult or animal data obtained from crash tests or whiplash experiments. However, it is doubtful whether such data accurately matches the biomechanics of shaking in an infant. Hence some thresholds may be inappropriate to be used for the assessment of inflicted head injury by shaking trauma in infants. A systematic literature review was conducted to 1) provide an overview of existing thresholds for head- and neck injuries related to violent shaking, and 2) to identify and discuss which thresholds have been used or could be used for the assessment of inflicted head injury by shaking trauma in infants. Key findings: The majority of studies establishing or proposing injury thresholds were found to be based on loading cycle durations and loading cycle repetitions that did not resemble those occurring during shaking, or had experimental conditions that were insufficiently documented in order to evaluate the applicability of such thresholds. Injury thresholds that were applied in studies aimed at assessing whether an injury could occur under certain shaking conditions were all based on experiments that did not properly replicate the loading characteristics of shaking. Somewhat validated threshold scaling methods only exist for scaling concussive injury thresholds from adult primate to adult human. Scaling methods that have been used for scaling other injuries, or for scaling adult injury thresholds to infants were not validated. There is a clear and urgent need for new injury thresholds established by accurately replicating the loading characteristics of shaking.
为了研究婴儿摇晃与损伤之间的潜在因果关系,生物力学研究将摇晃过程中大脑和颅骨的动态行为与损伤阈值进行了比较。然而,无论是在体内还是在体外进行婴儿耐摇性研究都极具难度,如果不是不可能的话。因此,婴儿损伤阈值通常是通过对碰撞测试或鞭打实验中获得的成人或动物数据进行缩放或外推来估计的。然而,这些数据是否能准确匹配婴儿摇晃的生物力学特性还值得怀疑。因此,一些阈值可能不适合用于评估因摇晃造成的婴儿头部损伤。进行了一项系统的文献综述,目的是:1)概述与剧烈摇晃相关的头部和颈部损伤的现有阈值;2)确定并讨论哪些阈值已被用于或可用于评估因摇晃造成的婴儿头部损伤。主要发现:建立或提出损伤阈值的大多数研究都发现,这些研究的加载循环持续时间和加载循环重复次数与摇晃过程中发生的情况并不相似,或者实验条件记录不足,难以评估这些阈值的适用性。在旨在评估在某些摇晃条件下是否可能发生损伤的研究中应用的损伤阈值,都是基于未能正确复制摇晃加载特征的实验。仅存在一些针对从成年灵长类动物到成人的脑震荡损伤阈值进行缩放的部分验证的阈值缩放方法。用于缩放其他损伤或缩放成人损伤阈值到婴儿的缩放方法未经验证。非常有必要建立新的损伤阈值,通过准确复制摇晃的加载特征来实现。