Suppr超能文献

一种治疗伴有神经功能缺损的上腰椎骨折的新减压技术——与传统后路开放手术的比较。

A new decompression technique for upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit-comparison with traditional open posterior surgery.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Spinal Surgery, Xi'an Zhongde Orthopedics Hospital, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Dec 1;20(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2897-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgery is usually recommended for thoracolumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. However, traditional open posterior approach requires massive paraspinal muscles stripping, and the canal decompression may be limited and incomplete. We aimed to investigate a new approach via the Wiltse approach and the Kambin's Triangle.

METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients with traumatic upper lumbar fracture who received this new approach surgery between January 2015 and January 2016 constituted the new approach group. Twenty-nine patients received the traditional open posterior surgery between January 2014 and January 2015 were classified as the traditional posterior surgery group. Surgical informations including operative time, blood loss, drainage volume, hospitalization days were collected and compared among the two groups. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale and Visual Analog Score (VAS) were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and at 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients in the new approach group had fewer operation time (128.3 ± 25.1 vs 151 ± 32.2 min, P = 0.01), less blood loss (243.8 ± 135.5 vs 437.8 ± 224.9 ml, P = 0.001) and drainage volume (70.7 ± 57.2 vs 271.7 ± 95.5 ml, P < 0.001), as well as shorter hospitalization stay than the traditional posterior surgery group (6.6 ± 1.8 vs 8.5 ± 2.4 d, P = 0.004). Similar neurologic recovery according to ASIA grade was achieved in both groups (Recovery index: 0.90 ± 0.53 vs 0.86 ± 0.51, P = 0.778). While the pain level was significantly lower in the new approach group postoperatively (2.6 ± 0.7 vs 3.5 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and at 12 months follow-up (1.4 ± 0.9 vs 2.4 ± 0.8, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The present new approach was successfully applied in the treatment of upper lumbar fracture with neurologic deficit. It can reduce iatrogenic trauma and achieve similar or better outcomes compared to the traditional posterior surgery.

摘要

背景

对于伴有神经功能缺损的胸腰椎骨折,通常推荐手术治疗。然而,传统的后路开放手术需要大量的脊柱旁肌剥离,椎管减压可能会受到限制且不完整。我们旨在通过 Wiltse 入路和 Kambin 三角研究一种新的方法。

方法

2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 1 月,我们连续对 21 例外伤性高位腰椎骨折患者采用这种新的手术入路(新方法组)。2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 1 月,29 例患者采用传统的后路开放手术(传统后路手术组)。收集两组患者的手术时间、出血量、引流量、住院天数等手术信息,并进行比较。采用美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表和视觉模拟评分(VAS)对术前、术后及 12 个月随访时进行评估。

结果

新方法组的手术时间更短(128.3±25.1 分钟 vs 151±32.2 分钟,P=0.01),出血量更少(243.8±135.5 毫升 vs 437.8±224.9 毫升,P=0.001),引流量更少(70.7±57.2 毫升 vs 271.7±95.5 毫升,P<0.001),住院时间更短(6.6±1.8 天 vs 8.5±2.4 天,P=0.004)。两组患者的神经功能恢复情况相似(恢复指数:0.90±0.53 vs 0.86±0.51,P=0.778)。新方法组术后疼痛水平明显低于传统后路手术组(2.6±0.7 分 vs 3.5±0.9 分,P<0.001),12 个月随访时仍较低(1.4±0.9 分 vs 2.4±0.8 分,P<0.001)。

结论

目前的新方法成功应用于伴有神经功能缺损的高位腰椎骨折的治疗,可减少医源性创伤,并与传统后路手术相比取得相似或更好的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验