Suppr超能文献

胸腰椎不稳定爆裂骨折的后路短节段固定——经椎弓根植骨还是六钉固定结构?

Posterior short-segment fixation in thoracolumbar unstable burst fractures - Transpedicular grafting or six-screw construct?

作者信息

Liao Jen-Chung, Fan Kuo-Fon

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;153:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Early implant failure and donor-site complication remain a concern in patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture underwent one-above and-below short-segment posterior pedicle screw fixation with fusion. Our aim was to evaluate the results of short-segment pedicle instrumentation enforced by two augmenting screws or injectable artificial bone cement in the fractured vertebra, and compare the differences between these two PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective clinical and radiographic study. Twenty-seven patients were treated with a six-screw construct (group 1), and twenty-nine patients underwenta four-screw construct and fractured vertebra augmentation by injectable calcium sulfate/phosphate cement (group 2). Posterior or posterolateral fusions were not performed in both groups. The severity of the fractured vertebra was evaluated by the load-sharing classification (LSC). Local kyphosis and anterior body height of the fractured vertebra were measured and were follow-up at least 2 years. Any implant failure or loss of correction >10° degrees at the final was defined as failure of surgery. Patients' clinical results were assessed by the Denis scale.

RESULTS

Blood loss and operation time were less in group 1 (126.2±9.7 vs. 267.6±126.1ml, p<0.001 and 141.2±48.7 vs. 189.8±16.4min, p<0.001). Immediately after surgery, group 2 had a better local kyphosis angle (3.7±5.3 vs.6.0±4.1°, p=0.047) and acquired more anterior body height (94.9%±7.6% vs. 84.9%±10.0%, p<0.001). Both groups had similar clinical results (pain score: 1.5±0.8vs. 1.4±0.6, p=0.706; work score: 1.7±0.9 vs. 1.6±1.0, p=0.854). Group 1 had 3 cases of surgery failure; group 2 had 8 cases of implant failure (p=0.121). The average LSC score of these 11 patients with surgical failure was 7.2.

CONCLUSION

Thesix-screw construct had the advantage of shorter operating time, less blood loss, and lower failure rate. For those patients with anLSC score ≧7, posterior short-segment instrumentation should be used cautiously.

摘要

目的

对于接受上下节段短节段后路椎弓根螺钉固定融合术的胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者,早期植入物失败和供区并发症仍是令人担忧的问题。我们的目的是评估在骨折椎体中使用两枚增强螺钉或可注射人工骨水泥强化的短节段椎弓根内固定的结果,并比较这两种方法之间的差异。

患者与方法

我们进行了一项回顾性临床和影像学研究。27例患者接受六枚螺钉固定(第1组),29例患者接受四枚螺钉固定并通过可注射硫酸钙/磷酸钙骨水泥对骨折椎体进行强化(第2组)。两组均未进行后路或后外侧融合。通过载荷分担分类法(LSC)评估骨折椎体的严重程度。测量骨折椎体的局部后凸和椎体前缘高度,并进行至少2年的随访。最终任何植入物失败或矫正丢失>10°定义为手术失败。通过Denis量表评估患者的临床结果。

结果

第1组的失血量和手术时间较少(126.2±9.7 vs. 267.6±126.1ml,p<0.001;141.2±48.7 vs. 189.8±16.4min,p<0.001)。术后即刻,第2组的局部后凸角更好(3.7±5.3 vs. 6.0±4.1°,p=0.047),椎体前缘高度增加更多(94.9%±7.6% vs. 84.9%±10.0%,p<0.001)。两组的临床结果相似(疼痛评分:1.5±0.8 vs. 1.4±0.6,p=0.706;工作评分:1.7±0.9 vs. 1.6±1.0,p=0.854)。第1组有3例手术失败;第2组有8例植入物失败(p=0.121)。这11例手术失败患者的平均LSC评分为7.2。

结论

六枚螺钉固定具有手术时间短、失血量少和失败率低的优势。对于LSC评分≧7的患者,应谨慎使用后路短节段内固定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验