Beisner Brianne A, Wooddell Lauren J, Hannibal Darcy L, Nathman Amy, McCowan Brenda
Department of Population Health & Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, UC Davis, Davis, CA, 95616 USA.
Neuroscience and Behavior Unit, California National Primate Research Center, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616 USA.
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2019 Mar;212:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
Socially inflicted traumas are a major concern for the management of captive groups of rhesus macaques. Rhesus macaques are the most commonly used nonhuman primate in biomedical research, and social housing is optimal for promoting psychological well-being. However, trauma is frequent due to a strong reliance on aggression to establish and maintain hierarchical relationships. We studied six captive groups of rhesus macaques () that underwent a variety of social perturbations and explored whether rates of aggression mapped onto rates of trauma using a fine-grained analysis that divided both aggression and trauma variables into specific, behaviorally-relevant categories (e.g., severe aggression by adult males relative to lacerations). Results did not show the expected positive relationship between aggression variables and trauma variables. Instead, rates of trauma (i.e., lacerations, moderate-severe trauma, total trauma) were negatively associated with the rate of impartial interventions (i.e., an intervention directed at both targets during an ongoing conflict) during baseline periods. Additionally, rates of trauma (i.e., lacerations, punctures, moderate-severe trauma, total trauma) were negatively associated with rates of total aggression following temporary knockouts of the individuals who commonly intervene impartially (i.e., conflict policers), and punctures and moderate-severe trauma were negatively associated with rates of severe aggression by adult males following permanent knockout of a high-ranked natal male. These results suggest that under homeostatic conditions, impartial interventions serve as a mechanism to reduce socially inflicted trauma but, following social manipulations of high-ranking males, an imbalance emerges. Our results underscore the importance of developing management strategies for rhesus macaque groups that promote internal social mechanisms of social stability such as maintaining conflict policing individuals (i.e., adult males) in social groups.
社会造成的创伤是圈养恒河猴群体管理中的一个主要问题。恒河猴是生物医学研究中最常用的非人类灵长类动物,群居环境最有利于促进心理健康。然而,由于强烈依赖攻击行为来建立和维持等级关系,创伤很常见。我们研究了六组圈养的恒河猴(),它们经历了各种社会扰动,并使用细粒度分析探讨攻击率是否与创伤率相关,该分析将攻击和创伤变量分为特定的、与行为相关的类别(例如成年雄性的严重攻击相对于撕裂伤)。结果并未显示攻击变量与创伤变量之间预期的正相关关系。相反,在基线期,创伤率(即撕裂伤、中度至重度创伤、总创伤)与公正干预率(即在持续冲突中针对两个目标的干预)呈负相关。此外,在通常进行公正干预的个体(即冲突调节者)暂时被剔除后,创伤率(即撕裂伤、刺伤、中度至重度创伤、总创伤)与总攻击率呈负相关,在一只高等级出生雄性永久被剔除后,刺伤和中度至重度创伤与成年雄性的严重攻击率呈负相关。这些结果表明,在稳态条件下,公正干预是减少社会造成创伤的一种机制,但在对高等级雄性进行社会操纵后,会出现失衡。我们的结果强调了为恒河猴群体制定管理策略的重要性,这些策略可促进社会稳定的内部社会机制,例如在社会群体中维持冲突调节个体(即成年雄性)。