• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜随访时残留组织对前交叉韧带重建术后结果的影响。

Effect of Remnant Tissues on Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at Follow-up Arthroscopy.

机构信息

Rehab Plus Sports Therapy, Scottsdale, Arizona; and.

Emoto Knee and Sport Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Clin J Sport Med. 2021 Jul 1;31(4):379-382. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000759.

DOI:10.1097/JSM.0000000000000759
PMID:31789869
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is sought to enhance vascularization and maturation of a graft and to produce positive clinical outcomes after reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate an effect of remnant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tissues on outcomes of ACLR 1 year after reconstruction in younger populations.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Inpatient orthopedic surgical and rehabilitation clinic.

SUBJECTS

The subjects were 644 patients who underwent primary ACLR.

INDEPENDENT VARIABLES

The independent variables were age, height, and body weight of the subjects, and the presence of remnant tissue.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measure was the number of subjects with secondary infra-articular injuries at a follow-up arthroscopy after ACLR. The odds ratio was calculated and compared between the remnant-preserving ACLR (ACLR-P) and remnant-resecting (ACLR-R) groups to investigate the effect of remnant tissues on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 416 cases met our inclusion criteria and were included in this study. There were 136 cases (49 males and 87 females) in the ACLR-P group with the mean age (±SD) of 17.86 ± 2.85 years. There were 280 cases (106 males and 174 females) in the ACLR-R group, and the mean age (±SD) was 18.13 ± 2.73 years. Of 136 cases in the ALCR-P group, 54 (39.7%) had abnormal arthroscopic findings that lead to a surgical intervention. Of 280 patients in the ACLR-R group, 128 (45.7%) had abnormal findings. Odds ratio was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-1.18; P = 0.24]. Four cases in the ACLR-P group and 8 in the ACLR-R group were diagnosed with ACL retear during follow-up arthroscopy. Odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.30-3.48; P = 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of ACL remnant tissues did not have a significant effect on outcomes 1 year after reconstruction. However, there was a trend that lower percentage of patients with remnant-preserving ALCR had abnormal arthroscopic findings that lead to a surgical treatment at follow-up arthroscopy 1 year after initial reconstruction. The presence of remnant tissues did not have a significant effect on retear rate.

摘要

背景

保留残端的前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)旨在增强移植物的血管化和成熟度,并在重建后产生积极的临床结果。

目的

本研究旨在探讨年轻患者中残留前交叉韧带(ACL)组织对 ACLR 后 1 年重建结果的影响。

设计

回顾性图表审查。

设置

住院骨科手术和康复诊所。

受试者

644 名接受初次 ACLR 的患者。

自变量

受试者的年龄、身高和体重以及是否存在残端组织。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标是在 ACLR 后随访关节镜检查中出现继发性关节下损伤的受试者数量。计算并比较保留残端 ACLR(ACLR-P)和切除残端(ACLR-R)组之间的优势比,以探讨残端组织对术后结果的影响。

结果

共有 416 例符合纳入标准,并纳入本研究。ACLR-P 组有 136 例(49 名男性和 87 名女性),平均年龄(±SD)为 17.86 ± 2.85 岁。ACLR-R 组有 280 例(106 名男性和 174 名女性),平均年龄(±SD)为 18.13 ± 2.73 岁。在 ACLR-P 组的 136 例中,54 例(39.7%)有导致手术干预的异常关节镜发现。在 ACLR-R 组的 280 例患者中,有 128 例(45.7%)有异常发现。优势比为 0.78 [95%置信区间(CI),0.51-1.18;P = 0.24]。ACLR-P 组中有 4 例和 ACLR-R 组中有 8 例在随访关节镜检查中被诊断为 ACL 再撕裂。优势比为 1.03(95%CI,0.30-3.48;P = 0.96)。

结论

ACL 残端组织的存在对重建后 1 年的结果没有显著影响。然而,有一个趋势表明,保留残端的 ACLR 患者中,有较低比例的患者在初次重建后 1 年的随访关节镜检查中出现异常关节镜发现,需要手术治疗。残端组织的存在对再撕裂率没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of Remnant Tissues on Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at Follow-up Arthroscopy.关节镜随访时残留组织对前交叉韧带重建术后结果的影响。
Clin J Sport Med. 2021 Jul 1;31(4):379-382. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000759.
2
Is Remnant Preservation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Superior to the Standard Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前交叉韧带重建术中保留残端优于标准技术吗?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Dec 11;2019:1652901. doi: 10.1155/2019/1652901. eCollection 2019.
3
A Retrospective Comparison of Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.单束前交叉韧带重建与双束前交叉韧带重建联合外侧关节外肌腱固定术的回顾性比较。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Mar;37(3):976-984. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
4
Remnant-Tensioning Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provides Comparable Stability to and Better Graft Vascularity Than Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Acute or Subacute Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.残留张力单束前交叉韧带重建术在急性或亚急性损伤中提供与双束前交叉韧带重建术相当的稳定性和更好的移植物血管生成:一项前瞻性随机对照研究使用动态对比增强磁共振成像。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Jan;37(1):209-221. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.035. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
5
No clinical difference in 10-year outcomes between standard and minimal graft debridement techniques in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings: a randomized controlled trial.在使用自体腘绳肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建的患者中,标准与最小化移植物清创技术在 10 年随访结果中无临床差异:一项随机对照试验。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Feb;27(2):516-523. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5146-5. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Effects of Remnant Tissue Preservation on Clinical and Arthroscopic Results After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.保留残余组织对解剖双束前交叉韧带重建术后临床及关节镜检查结果的影响
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1882-92. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587713. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
7
Long-term Graft Rupture Rates After Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI Study Group.前交叉韧带和前外侧复合体重建与单纯前交叉韧带重建后长期移植物断裂率:来自 SANTI 研究组的配对分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Sep;49(11):2889-2897. doi: 10.1177/03635465211028990. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
8
Preservation of remnant with poor synovial coverage has no beneficial effect over remnant sacrifice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.在前交叉韧带重建术中,保留覆盖不良的残端并没有比牺牲残端更有益。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Aug;26(8):2345-2352. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4683-7. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
9
Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.桥接增强前交叉韧带修复并不逊于自体移植物前交叉韧带重建 2 年的结果:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1305-1315. doi: 10.1177/0363546520913532. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
10
Clinical Outcomes of Isolated Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction or in Combination With Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.孤立性前交叉韧带重建或联合解剖前外侧韧带重建的临床结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):324-333. doi: 10.1177/0363546518815888. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches for the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury: a Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol.不同手术入路治疗前交叉韧带损伤的疗效和安全性比较:贝叶斯网状meta 分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 29;14(3):e077242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077242.
2
Reliability of the Tibial Spine Versus ACL Stump in Assisting Tibial Tunnel Positioning During ACL Reconstruction: Analysis Based on 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Modeling.前交叉韧带重建术中胫骨棘与前交叉韧带残端在辅助胫骨隧道定位方面的可靠性:基于三维计算机断层扫描建模的分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Nov 10;11(11):23259671231208678. doi: 10.1177/23259671231208678. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Clinical application of modified Crain classification in the Design of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with remnant preservation.
改良 Crain 分类在保留残端的前交叉韧带重建设计中的临床应用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):1066. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05912-7.