Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA,
Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Oncology. 2020;98(3):174-178. doi: 10.1159/000504578. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
Retrospective case studies in various cancers have shown clinical benefit from chemotherapy following PD-1 inhibitor progression. We asked whether we see a similar clinical benefit with chemotherapy following PD-1 inhibitor progression in metastatic melanoma. We performed a retrospective study in patients with metastatic melanoma, who had received PD-1 inhibitor-based treatments, subsequently progressed, and eventually received chemotherapy. We identified 25 patients (median age 58 years; range 31-77 years; 13 females). Most patients had cutaneous melanoma (72%), were BRAFV600E-negative (75%), and received single-agent temozolomide (84%). At a median follow-up of 21.0 months (range: 4.1-154.2 months), 2 patients had durable response to chemotherapy (progression-free survival is 31.9+ and 21.6+ months, respectively), and 1 patient had a partial, short-term response. We conclude that in this poor prognosis group administration of chemotherapy has a 12% response rate that can be durable. Overall, the clinical benefit is not inferior to that of PD-1 inhibitor-based treatments.
回顾性病例研究显示,在 PD-1 抑制剂进展后进行化疗可使多种癌症患者获益。我们想了解在转移性黑色素瘤患者中,PD-1 抑制剂进展后进行化疗是否也能带来类似的临床获益。我们对接受 PD-1 抑制剂治疗后进展,最终接受化疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者进行了回顾性研究。共纳入 25 名患者(中位年龄 58 岁;范围 31-77 岁;13 名女性)。大多数患者为皮肤黑色素瘤(72%),BRAFV600E 阴性(75%),接受单药替莫唑胺治疗(84%)。中位随访时间为 21.0 个月(范围:4.1-154.2 个月),2 名患者对化疗有持久应答(无进展生存期分别为 31.9+和 21.6+个月),1 名患者出现部分缓解,持续时间较短。我们的结论是,在这一预后较差的患者群体中,化疗的应答率为 12%,且可能持久。总的来说,临床获益并不逊于 PD-1 抑制剂治疗。