• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的床边输血前血液及其成分身份核对方法:Sandesh 正-负方案。

A novel approach to bedside pretransfusion identity check of blood and its components: the Sandesh Positive-Negative protocol.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.

Department of Anesthesiology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun;73(3):232-238. doi: 10.4097/kja.19402. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

DOI:10.4097/kja.19402
PMID:31795620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7280885/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood component mistransfusion is generally due to preventable clerical errors, specifically pretransfusion misidentification of patient/blood unit at bedside. Hence, electronic devices such as barcode scanners are recommended as the standard instrument used to check the patient's identity. However, several healthcare facilities in underdeveloped countries cannot afford this instrument; hence, they usually perform subjective visual assessment to check the patient's identity. This type of assessment is prone to clinical errors, which precipitates significant level of anxiety in the healthcare personnel transfusing the blood unit. Hence, a novel objective method in performing pretransfusion identity check, the 'Sandesh Positive-Negative (SPON) protocol,' was developed.

METHODS

A nonrandomized study on bedside pretransfusion identity check was conducted, and 75 health care personnel performed transfusion. The intervention was performed by matching a custom-made negative label with blood component with the positive label of the same patient available at bedside who was about to receive transfusion.

RESULTS

In total, 85.3% of the subjects were anxious while performing pretransfusion identity check based on the existing standard practice. After the implementation of the SPON protocol, only 38.7% experienced either mild, moderate or severe anxiety. The overall level of satisfaction also increased from 8.0% to 38.7% and none were dissatisfied. Although only 9.3% were dissatisfied about the existing practice, approximately 70.7% felt the need for a better/additional protocol. Clerical error was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPON protocol is a cost-effective objective method that reduces anxiety and increases satisfaction levels when performing final bedside identity check of blood components.

摘要

背景

血液成分输注错误通常是由于可预防的文书错误引起的,特别是在床边进行输血前患者/血液单位的身份识别错误。因此,建议使用条形码扫描器等电子设备作为核对患者身份的标准仪器。然而,一些欠发达国家的医疗机构无法承担这种仪器的费用;因此,他们通常进行主观的视觉评估来核对患者的身份。这种评估容易出现临床错误,导致输注血液单位的医护人员产生很大程度的焦虑。因此,开发了一种新的客观方法,即“桑德什正负(SPON)协议”,用于进行输血前的身份核对。

方法

进行了一项非随机的床边输血前身份核对研究,共有 75 名医护人员进行了输血。干预措施是将定制的阴性标签与血液成分进行匹配,同时将同一即将接受输血的患者的阳性标签放在床边。

结果

在基于现有标准实践进行输血前身份核对时,85.3%的受试者感到焦虑。实施 SPON 协议后,只有 38.7%的受试者感到轻度、中度或重度焦虑。总体满意度也从 8.0%增加到 38.7%,且无人不满意。尽管只有 9.3%的人对现有做法不满意,但约 70.7%的人认为需要更好/额外的协议。没有观察到文书错误。

结论

SPON 协议是一种具有成本效益的客观方法,可降低焦虑程度并提高床边血液成分最终身份核对的满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803c/7280885/59e3605338fd/kja-19402f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803c/7280885/b0afe8aa852c/kja-19402f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803c/7280885/59e3605338fd/kja-19402f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803c/7280885/b0afe8aa852c/kja-19402f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803c/7280885/59e3605338fd/kja-19402f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel approach to bedside pretransfusion identity check of blood and its components: the Sandesh Positive-Negative protocol.一种新的床边输血前血液及其成分身份核对方法:Sandesh 正-负方案。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun;73(3):232-238. doi: 10.4097/kja.19402. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
2
Prevention of bedside errors in transfusion medicine (PROBE-TM) study: a cluster-randomized, matched-paired clinical areas trial of a simple intervention to reduce errors in the pretransfusion bedside check.输血医学床边差错预防(PROBE-TM)研究:一项群组随机、配对临床区域试验,针对一项简单干预措施以减少输血前床边检查中的差错。
Transfusion. 2007 May;47(5):771-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01189.x.
3
Issuing of blood components dispensed in syringes and bar code-based pretransfusion check at the bedside for pediatric patients.为儿科患者发放用注射器分装的血液成分并在床边进行基于条形码的输血前检查。
Transfusion. 2009 Jul;49(7):1423-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02164.x. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
4
[The pretransfusion bedside agglutination test is not a "Gold Standard"].[输血前床边凝集试验并非“金标准”]
Transfus Clin Biol. 2008 Nov;15(5):318-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2008.09.028. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
5
Causes of failure of a barcode-based pretransfusion check at the bedside: experience in a university hospital.床边基于条形码的输血前检查失败原因:一所大学医院的经验
Transfus Med. 2008 Aug;18(4):216-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2008.00868.x.
6
A computer-assisted transfusion management system and changed transfusion practices contribute to appropriate management of blood components.计算机辅助输血管理系统和改变的输血实践有助于血液成分的合理管理。
Transfusion. 2008 Aug;48(8):1730-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01744.x. Epub 2008 May 14.
7
[Yes, we should keep ABO agglutination test within bedside transfusion checks].是的,我们应该在床边输血检查中进行ABO血型凝集试验。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2008 Nov;15(5):322-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2008.09.029. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
8
Challenges and opportunities to prevent transfusion errors: a Qualitative Evaluation for Safer Transfusion (QUEST).预防输血错误的挑战和机遇:更安全输血的定性评估 (QUEST)。
Transfusion. 2012 Aug;52(8):1687-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03514.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
9
New technology for transfusion safety.输血安全新技术。
Br J Haematol. 2007 Jan;136(2):181-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06373.x. Epub 2006 Nov 8.
10
Blood bank protocols for large-scale civilian casualty events: experience from terrorist bombing in Israel.大规模平民伤亡事件的血库方案:来自以色列恐怖爆炸事件的经验
Transfus Med. 2007 Apr;17(2):135-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00713.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Transparency considerations for describing statistical analyses in research.描述研究中统计分析的透明度考虑因素。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec;74(6):488-495. doi: 10.4097/kja.21203. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) haemovigilance and progress is improving transfusion safety.严重输血不良反应(SHOT)监测有助于提高输血安全性。
Br J Haematol. 2013 Nov;163(3):303-14. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12547. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
2
Transfusion recipient identification.输血受者识别
Vox Sang. 2006 Aug;91(2):97-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00783.x.
3
End-to-end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses.医院输血过程的端到端电子控制以提高输血安全性:优势与不足
Transfusion. 2006 Mar;46(3):352-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00729.x.
4
Barcode identification for transfusion safety.用于输血安全的条形码识别
Curr Opin Hematol. 2004 Sep;11(5):334-8. doi: 10.1097/01.moh.0000142801.38087.e5.
5
Barcode technology: its role in increasing the safety of blood transfusion.条形码技术:其在提高输血安全性中的作用。
Transfusion. 2003 Sep;43(9):1200-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00428.x.
6
An international study of the performance of sample collection from patients.一项关于从患者身上采集样本操作的国际研究。
Vox Sang. 2003 Jul;85(1):40-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00313.x.
7
Reporting of near-miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety.输血医学中险些发生的不良事件报告:提高输血安全性。
Transfusion. 2001 Oct;41(10):1204-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41101204.x.