Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Feb;23(2):348-355. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003410. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
To understand price incentives to upsize combination meals at fast-food restaurants by comparing the calories (i.e. kilocalories; 1 kcal = 4·184 kJ) per dollar of default combination meals (as advertised on the menu) with a higher-calorie version (created using realistic consumer additions and portion-size changes).
Combination meals (lunch/dinner: n 258, breakfast: n 68, children's: n 34) and their prices were identified from online menus; corresponding nutrition information for each menu item was obtained from a restaurant nutrition database (MenuStat). Linear models were used to examine the difference in total calories per dollar between default and higher-calorie combination meals, overall and by restaurant.
Ten large fast-food chain restaurants located in the fifteen most populous US cities in 2017-2018.
None.
There were significantly more calories per dollar in higher-calorie v. default combination meals for lunch/dinner (default: 577 kJ (138 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 707 kJ (169 kcal)/dollar, difference: 130 kJ (31 kcal)/dollar, P < 0·001) and breakfast (default: 536 kJ (128 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 607 kJ (145 kcal)/dollar, difference: 71 kJ (17 kcal)/dollar, P = 0·009). Results for children's meals were in the same direction but were not statistically significant (default: 536 kJ (128 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 741 kJ (177 kcal)/dollar, difference: 205 kJ (49 kcal)/dollar, P = 0·053). Across restaurants, the percentage change in calories per dollar for higher-calorie v. default combination meals ranged from 0·1 % (Dunkin' Donuts) to 55·0 % (Subway).
Higher-calorie combination meals in fast-food restaurants offer significantly more calories per dollar compared with default combination meals, suggesting there is a strong financial incentive for consumers to 'upsize' their orders. Future research should test price incentives for lower-calorie options to promote healthier restaurant choices.
通过比较快餐店内默认组合餐(菜单上广告)与较高卡路里版本(使用实际消费者添加和份量变化创建)的每美元卡路里数(即千卡;1 千卡=4.184 千焦耳),了解快餐店加大组合餐份量的价格激励因素。
从在线菜单中确定组合餐(午餐/晚餐:n=258,早餐:n=68,儿童餐:n=34)及其价格;从餐厅营养数据库(MenuStat)获取每个菜单项的相应营养信息。使用线性模型检验默认和较高卡路里组合餐的每美元总卡路里数之间的差异,整体和按餐厅分类。
2017-2018 年美国 15 个人口最多城市的 10 家大型快餐连锁店。
无。
午餐/晚餐较高卡路里 v. 默认组合餐的每美元卡路里数明显更高(默认:577 千焦耳(138 千卡)/美元,较高卡路里:707 千焦耳(169 千卡)/美元,差异:130 千焦耳(31 千卡)/美元,P<0·001)和早餐(默认:536 千焦耳(128 千卡)/美元,较高卡路里:607 千焦耳(145 千卡)/美元,差异:71 千焦耳(17 千卡)/美元,P=0·009)。儿童餐的结果方向相同,但无统计学意义(默认:536 千焦耳(128 千卡)/美元,较高卡路里:741 千焦耳(177 千卡)/美元,差异:205 千焦耳(49 千卡)/美元,P=0·053)。在不同餐厅,较高卡路里 v. 默认组合餐的卡路里数每美元百分比变化范围为 0·1%(Dunkin' Donuts)至 55·0%(Subway)。
快餐店内较高卡路里的组合餐与默认组合餐相比,每美元提供的卡路里数明显更多,这表明消费者“加大”订单的强烈经济激励。未来的研究应该测试较低卡路里选择的价格激励因素,以促进更健康的餐厅选择。