Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Division of Intramural Research, NIEHS/NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Mol Cell Biochem. 2020 Feb;465(1-2):37-51. doi: 10.1007/s11010-019-03665-x. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
Previously, we showed that adenosine A receptor induces relaxation independent of NO in soluble epoxide hydrolase-null mice (Nayeem et al. in Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 304:R23-R32, 2013). Currently, we hypothesize that Ephx2-gene deletion affects acetylcholine (Ach)-induced relaxation which is independent of AAR but dependent on NO and CYP-epoxygenases. Ephx2 aortas showed a lack of sEH (97.1%, P < 0.05) but an increase in microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH, 37%, P < 0.05) proteins compared to C57Bl/6 mice, and no change in CYP2C29 and CYP2J protein (P > 0.05). Ach-induced response was tested with nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) NO-inhibitor; 10 M), N-(methylsulfonyl)-2-(2-propynyloxy)-benzenehexanamide (MS-PPOH) (CYP-epoxygenase inhibitor; 10 M), 14,15-epoxyeicosa-5(Z)-enoic acid (14,15-EEZE, an epoxyeicosatrienoic acid-antagonist; 10 M), SCH-58261 (AAR-antagonist; 10 M), and angiotensin-II (Ang-II, 10 M). In Ephx2 mice, Ach-induced relaxation was not different from C57Bl/6 mice except at 10 M (92.75 ± 2.41 vs. 76.12 ± 3.34, P < 0.05). However, Ach-induced relaxation was inhibited with L-NAME (Ephx2: 23.74 ± 3.76% and C57Bl/6: 11.61 ± 2.82%), MS-PPOH (Ephx2: 48.16 ± 6.53% and C57Bl/6: 52.27 ± 7.47%), and 14,15-EEZE (Ephx2: 44.29 ± 8.33% and C57Bl/6: 39.27 ± 7.47%) vs. non-treated (P < 0.05). But, it did not block with SCH-58261 (Ephx2: 68.75 ± 11.41% and C57Bl/6: 66.26 ± 9.43%, P > 0.05) vs. non-treated (P > 0.05). Interestingly, Ang-II attenuates less relaxation in Ehx2 vs. C57Bl/6 mice (58.80 ± 7.81% vs. 45.92 ± 7.76, P < 0.05). Our data suggest that Ach-induced relaxation in Ephx2 mice depends on NO and CYP-epoxygenases but not on A AR, and Ephx2-gene deletion attenuates less Ach-induced relaxation in Ang-II-infused mice.
先前,我们已经证实,在可溶性环氧化物水解酶缺失的小鼠中,腺苷 A 受体通过诱导松弛反应来发挥作用,且该反应独立于一氧化氮(NO)的产生(Nayeem 等人,Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 304:R23-R32, 2013)。目前,我们假设 Ephx2 基因缺失会影响乙酰胆碱(Ach)诱导的松弛反应,这种松弛反应独立于 AAR,但依赖于 NO 和 CYP 环氧化物水解酶。与 C57Bl/6 小鼠相比,Ephx2 主动脉的可溶性环氧化物水解酶(sEH)缺失了 97.1%(P<0.05),但微粒体环氧化物水解酶(mEH)增加了 37%(P<0.05),CYP2C29 和 CYP2J 蛋白无变化(P>0.05)。我们用硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME)NO 抑制剂(10 μM)、N-(甲基磺酰基)-2-(2-丙炔氧基)-苯己烷酰胺(MS-PPOH,CYP 环氧化物水解酶抑制剂;10 μM)、14,15-环氧二十碳五烯酸(14,15-EEZE,一种环氧二十碳三烯酸拮抗剂;10 μM)、SCH-58261(AAR 拮抗剂;10 μM)和血管紧张素-II(Ang-II,10 μM)来检测 Ach 诱导的反应。在 Ephx2 小鼠中,Ach 诱导的松弛反应与 C57Bl/6 小鼠没有区别,除了在 10 μM 时(92.75±2.41%对 76.12±3.34%,P<0.05)。然而,用 L-NAME(Ephx2:23.74±3.76%和 C57Bl/6:11.61±2.82%)、MS-PPOH(Ephx2:48.16±6.53%和 C57Bl/6:52.27±7.47%)和 14,15-EEZE(Ephx2:44.29±8.33%和 C57Bl/6:39.27±7.47%)处理后,Ach 诱导的松弛反应均被抑制,而非治疗组(P<0.05)。但用 SCH-58261 处理后,Ephx2 组(68.75±11.41%)和 C57Bl/6 组(66.26±9.43%)的松弛反应与非治疗组无差异(P>0.05)。有趣的是,与 C57Bl/6 小鼠相比,Ang-II 对 Ephx2 小鼠 Ach 诱导的松弛反应的抑制作用较小(58.80±7.81%对 45.92±7.76%,P<0.05)。我们的数据表明,Ephx2 小鼠中的 Ach 诱导松弛反应依赖于 NO 和 CYP 环氧化物水解酶,但不依赖于 AAR,Ephx2 基因缺失可减少 Ang-II 输注小鼠中 Ach 诱导的松弛反应。