Kumar Mukesh, Kumari Sommya, Shetty Pramod, Kumar Reena Ranjeet, Singh Dhirendra Pratap, Shetty Prakrathi
Department of Orthodontics, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Department of Prosthodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India, Phone: +91 8969859326, e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Sep 1;20(9):1051-1055.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the values of Steiner's cephalometric analysis using Nemoceph and Foxit PDF Reader. No significant difference between the two methods will result in that Foxit PDF Reader can be used as a cost-effective alternative.
This study was conducted on 100 digital lateral cephalograms taken from the same machine. The samples were collected by nonprobability convenience sampling procedures. These images were analyzed for Steiner's cephalometric analysis using two software packages.
The skeletal and dental values showed no statistically significant difference in the majority, except for the L1-NA (linear) and L1-NB (linear).
Results showed that there is a high agreement between the two methods.
This article provides a simple and cost-effective method of onscreen cephalometric analysis. This technique uses the inbuilt measurement tools in the tool bar of our daily use software. The method can be used independently anywhere without any internet connection and software subscription.
本研究旨在评估和比较使用Nemoceph和福昕PDF阅读器进行施泰纳头影测量分析的价值。如果两种方法之间没有显著差异，那么福昕PDF阅读器可作为一种经济高效的替代方法。
本研究对从同一台机器获取的100张数字化头颅侧位片进行。样本通过非概率便利抽样程序收集。使用两个软件包对这些图像进行施泰纳头影测量分析。
除了L1-NA（线性）和L1-NB（线性）外，大多数骨骼和牙齿测量值在统计学上无显著差异。
结果表明两种方法之间具有高度一致性。
本文提供了一种简单且经济高效的屏幕上头影测量分析方法。该技术使用我们日常使用软件工具栏中的内置测量工具。该方法无需任何互联网连接和软件订阅，可在任何地方独立使用。
