Zheng Cheng, Cai Jiachang, Liu Haizhou, Zhang Shufang, Zhong Li, Xuan Nanxia, Zhou Hongwei, Zhang Kai, Wang Yesong, Zhang Xijiang, Tian Baoping, Zhang Zhaocai, Wang Changming, Cui Wei, Zhang Gensheng
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, People's Republic of China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Oct 31;12:3397-3407. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S217905. eCollection 2019.
Although the enterococcal bloodstream infections (EBSI) are often observed in clinic, the mixed-EBSI are few reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of mixed-EBSI in comparison with monomicrobial EBSI (mono-EBSI).
A single-center retrospective observational study was performed between Jan 1, 2013 and Dec 31, 2018 in a tertiary hospital. All patients with EBSI were enrolled, and their data were collected by reviewing electronic medical records.
A total of 451 patients with EBSI were enrolled including 157 cases (34.8%) with mixed-EBSI. The most common co-pathogens were (26.86%), followed by (23.43%) and (8.57%). In multivariable analysis, burn injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.69-20.28), and length of prior hospital stay (aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) were associated with mixed-EBSI. Patients with mixed-EBSI developed with more proportion of septic shock (19% vs. 31.8%, p=0.002), prolonged length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay [9(0,25) vs. 15(2.5,36), p<0.001] and hospital stay [29(16,49) vs. 33(18.5,63), p=0.031]. The mortality was not significantly different between mixed-EBSI and mono-EBSI (p=0.219).
A high rate of mixed-EBSI is among EBSI, and is the second predominant co-existed species, except for . Burn injury and length of prior hospital stay are independent risk factors for mixed-EBSI. Although the mortality is not different, patients with mixed-EBSI might have poor outcomes in comparison with mono-EBSI, which merits more attention by physicians in the future.
尽管临床上经常观察到肠球菌血流感染(EBSI),但混合性EBSI的报道较少。本研究的目的是调查混合性EBSI与单一微生物EBSI(单一EBSI)相比的临床特征和危险因素。
在一家三级医院于2013年1月1日至2018年12月31日进行了一项单中心回顾性观察研究。纳入所有EBSI患者,并通过查阅电子病历收集他们的数据。
共纳入451例EBSI患者,其中157例(34.8%)为混合性EBSI。最常见的合并病原体是(26.86%),其次是(23.43%)和(8.57%)。在多变量分析中,烧伤(调整后的优势比[aOR],7.39;95%置信区间[CI],2.69 - 20.28)和既往住院时间(aOR,1.01;95%CI,1.00 - 1.02)与混合性EBSI相关。混合性EBSI患者发生感染性休克的比例更高(19%对31.8%,p = 0.002),重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间延长[9(0,25)对15(2.5,36),p < 0.001]和住院时间延长[29(16,49)对33(18.5,63),p = 0.031]。混合性EBSI和单一EBSI之间的死亡率无显著差异(p = 0.219)。
EBSI中混合性EBSI的发生率较高,除了外,是第二主要的共存菌种。烧伤和既往住院时间是混合性EBSI的独立危险因素。尽管死亡率无差异,但与单一EBSI相比,混合性EBSI患者可能预后较差,这在未来值得医生更多关注。