• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舒巴坦联合疗法对多重耐药菌引起的单微生物和多微生物肺部感染的疗效评估

Evaluation of the efficacy of sulbactam combination therapy for monomicrobial and polymicrobial pulmonary infections caused by multidrug-resistant .

作者信息

Peng Liangfei, Yang Xuemei, Qiu Xiaohua, Wang Li, Chen Ling, Wei Jiachen, Jing Chuwei, Wu Xiancheng, Li Wen, Wang Danni, Qian Qian, Sun Wenkui

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jun 3;13(6):e0335524. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03355-24. Epub 2025 May 14.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.03355-24
PMID:40366153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131869/
Abstract

The efficacy in treatment of monomicrobial versus polymicrobial (mono-AB vs poly-AB) pulmonary infections remains unclear. This study mainly investigated the efficacy of sulbactam combination regimens against mono-AB and poly-AB pulmonary infections. A multicenter retrospective study of adult patients who received sulbactam or cefoperazone/sulbactam for multidrug-resistant (MDRAB) between August 2021 and July 2023 was conducted. The outcomes of 7-day microbiological efficacy and 14-day clinical efficacy were measured. A total of 366 patients were enrolled, including 75 mono-AB patients. Among the 291 poly-AB cases, 82 patients were co-infected with and 76 patients with . All isolates exhibited multidrug resistance. The antibiotics demonstrating the highest sensitivity against these isolates were polymyxins and tigecycline, with sensitivity rates of 91.25% and 71.63%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, patients receiving sulbactam-based treatment for poly-AB pulmonary infections exhibited significantly higher microbial clearance of compared with those with mono-AB infections. Microbial efficacy analysis of co-infection with or showed similar results to overall poly-AB infections. Sulbactam doses ≥ 8 g/day showed the best microbiological and clinical efficacy. Sulbactam combined with tigecycline and/or polymyxins demonstrated significantly better microbiological efficacy compared with sulbactam alone. Sulbactam combined with polymyxins resulted in better microbiological and clinical efficacy than when combined with tigecycline. In conclusion, patients with poly-AB lung infections exhibit a higher microbial clearance rate of following treatment compared with those with mono-AB infections. A daily dose ≥8 g sulbactam may be optimal for treating MDRAB pneumonia. The combination of sulbactam and polymyxins demonstrates significant advantages over other sulbactam-containing regimens in terms of microbiological and clinical efficacy.IMPORTANCEThis is the first multicenter retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of sulbactam combination regimens in the treatment of monomicrobial and polymicrobial AB-related pulmonary infections. Our study found that patients receiving sulbactam-based treatment for poly-AB pulmonary infections exhibited significantly higher microbial clearance of compared with those with mono-AB infections. Microbial efficacy analysis of co-infection with or showed similar results to overall poly-AB infections. These findings are significantly important for further analyzing the potential mechanisms underlying the differences in efficacy between antimicrobial treatments for monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections, as well as for optimizing clinical antimicrobial combination strategies.

摘要

单微生物与多微生物(单重AB感染与多重AB感染)肺部感染的治疗效果仍不明确。本研究主要探讨了舒巴坦联合用药方案治疗单重AB感染和多重AB感染肺部感染的疗效。对2021年8月至2023年7月期间接受舒巴坦或头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌(MDRAB)的成年患者进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。测量了7天微生物学疗效和14天临床疗效。共纳入366例患者,其中单重AB感染患者75例。在291例多重AB感染病例中,82例患者合并感染[具体菌种1],76例患者合并感染[具体菌种2]。所有[具体菌种1]和[具体菌种2]分离株均表现出多重耐药性。对这些分离株显示出最高敏感性的抗生素是多黏菌素和替加环素,敏感性率分别为91.25%和71.63%。在多变量分析中,接受基于舒巴坦治疗的多重AB感染肺部感染患者的[具体菌种]微生物清除率显著高于单重AB感染患者。[具体菌种1]或[具体菌种2]合并感染的微生物疗效分析结果与总体多重AB感染相似。舒巴坦剂量≥8 g/天显示出最佳的微生物学和临床疗效。与单独使用舒巴坦相比,舒巴坦联合替加环素和/或多黏菌素显示出显著更好的微生物学疗效。舒巴坦联合多黏菌素比联合替加环素产生更好的微生物学和临床疗效。总之,与单重AB感染患者相比,多重AB肺部感染患者治疗后[具体菌种]的微生物清除率更高。每日剂量≥8 g舒巴坦可能是治疗MDRAB肺炎的最佳选择。在微生物学和临床疗效方面,舒巴坦与多黏菌素的联合用药方案比其他含舒巴坦的方案具有显著优势。

重要性

这是第一项调查舒巴坦联合用药方案治疗单微生物和多微生物AB相关肺部感染疗效的多中心回顾性研究。我们的研究发现,接受基于舒巴坦治疗的多重AB感染肺部感染患者的[具体菌种]微生物清除率显著高于单重AB感染患者。[具体菌种1]或[具体菌种2]合并感染的微生物疗效分析结果与总体多重AB感染相似。这些发现对于进一步分析单微生物和多微生物感染抗菌治疗疗效差异的潜在机制以及优化临床抗菌联合策略具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a792/12131869/d2da9e7215b3/spectrum.03355-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a792/12131869/a1fc777c06a3/spectrum.03355-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a792/12131869/a395ac46ca18/spectrum.03355-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a792/12131869/d2da9e7215b3/spectrum.03355-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a792/12131869/a1fc777c06a3/spectrum.03355-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a792/12131869/a395ac46ca18/spectrum.03355-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a792/12131869/d2da9e7215b3/spectrum.03355-24.f003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the efficacy of sulbactam combination therapy for monomicrobial and polymicrobial pulmonary infections caused by multidrug-resistant .舒巴坦联合疗法对多重耐药菌引起的单微生物和多微生物肺部感染的疗效评估
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jun 3;13(6):e0335524. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03355-24. Epub 2025 May 14.
2
Observation of clinical efficacy of the cefoperazone/sulbactam anti-infective regimen in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii lung infection.头孢哌酮/舒巴坦抗感染方案治疗多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺部感染的临床疗效观察。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Jul;47(7):1020-1027. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13638. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
Comparison of the clinical efficacy between tigecycline plus extended-infusion imipenem and sulbactam plus imipenem against ventilator-associated pneumonia with pneumonic extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia, and correlation of clinical efficacy with in vitro synergy tests.替加环素联合延长输注亚胺培南与舒巴坦联合亚胺培南治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎合并泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症的临床疗效比较及体外协同试验与临床疗效的相关性分析。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016 Dec;49(6):924-933. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
4
In vitro activity of tigecycline in combination with cefoperazone-sulbactam against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.替加环素联合头孢哌酮-舒巴坦对多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌的体外活性
J Chemother. 2015 Oct;27(5):271-6. doi: 10.1179/1973947814Y.0000000203. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
5
Comparison of Tigecycline or Cefoperazone/Sulbactam therapy for bloodstream infection due to Carbapenem-resistant .比较替加环素或头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗碳青霉烯类耐药. 引起的血流感染。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Mar 6;8:52. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0502-x. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparison of the treatment efficacy between tigecycline plus high-dose cefoperazone-sulbactam and tigecycline monotherapy against ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.替加环素联合大剂量头孢哌酮-舒巴坦与替加环素单药治疗广泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎的疗效比较。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Mar;56(3):120-129. doi: 10.5414/CP203102.
7
Comparison of the efficacies of three empirically-selected antibiotics for treating Acinetobacter baumannii pulmonary infection: experience from a teaching hospital in China

.三种经验性选择的抗生素治疗鲍曼不动杆菌肺部感染的疗效比较:来自中国一家教学医院的经验
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jul;55(7):588-593. doi: 10.5414/CP202557.
8
Bloodstream infections caused by ST2 Acinetobacter baumannii: risk factors, antibiotic regimens, and virulence over 6 years period in China.中国 6 年间血流感染 ST2 型鲍曼不动杆菌的危险因素、抗生素治疗方案和毒力特征。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Jan 18;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00876-6.
9
Treatment efficacy of tigecycline in comparison to cefoperazone/ sulbactam alone or in combination therapy for carbapenenm-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections.替加环素与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦单独或联合治疗对碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌感染的疗效比较。
Pak J Pharm Sci. 2020 Jan;33(1):161-168.
10
Treatment options for K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii co-resistant to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, polymyxins and tigecycline: an approach based on the mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems.碳青霉烯类、氨基糖苷类、多黏菌素类和替加环素耐药的肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌的治疗选择:基于碳青霉烯类耐药机制的方法。
Infection. 2020 Dec;48(6):835-851. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01520-6. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors and outcome associated with coinfection with carbapenem-resistant and carbapenem-resistant or a descriptive analysis.耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科细菌和耐碳青霉烯肠杆菌科细菌或 合并感染的危险因素和结局:一项描述性分析。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Oct 16;13:1231740. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1231740. eCollection 2023.
2
Cross-protection and cross-feeding between Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii promotes their co-existence.肺炎克雷伯菌和鲍曼不动杆菌之间的交叉保护和交叉喂养促进了它们的共存。
Nat Commun. 2023 Feb 9;14(1):702. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36252-2.
3
Staphylococcus aureus host interactions and adaptation.
金黄色葡萄球菌宿主相互作用和适应。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023 Jun;21(6):380-395. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00852-y. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
4
Polymicrobial Infections and Biofilms: Clinical Significance and Eradication Strategies.多重微生物感染与生物膜:临床意义及根除策略
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 1;11(12):1731. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121731.
5
Geographic patterns of Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem resistance in the Asia-Pacific Region: results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program, 2012-2019.亚太地区鲍曼不动杆菌及碳青霉烯类耐药的地理分布模式:2012 - 2019年抗菌药物检测领导力与监测(ATLAS)项目的结果
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Feb;127:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.12.010. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
6
Clinical Outcomes Associated with Co-infection of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales and other Multidrug-Resistant Organisms.耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌与其他多重耐药菌合并感染的临床结局
Infect Prev Pract. 2022 Oct 17;4(4):100255. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100255. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcomes of patients with mixed Candida/bacterial bloodstream infections: a retrospective study.混合念珠菌/细菌血流感染患者的发病率、临床特征、危险因素和结局:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2022 Nov 1;21(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12941-022-00538-y.
8
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Colistin Combined with Sulbactam: 9 g per Day versus 12 g per Day in the Treatment of Extensively Drug-Resistant Pneumonia: An Interim Analysis.多黏菌素联合舒巴坦治疗广泛耐药肺炎的随机对照试验:每日9克与每日12克的疗效对比——一项中期分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;11(8):1112. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081112.
9
Co-isolates of complex in polymicrobial infections: a meta-analysis.多微生物感染中复合体的共分离物:一项荟萃分析。
Access Microbiol. 2022 May 9;4(5):acmi000348. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000348. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Observation of clinical efficacy of the cefoperazone/sulbactam anti-infective regimen in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii lung infection.头孢哌酮/舒巴坦抗感染方案治疗多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺部感染的临床疗效观察。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Jul;47(7):1020-1027. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13638. Epub 2022 Mar 14.