iPSYCH - The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, Copenhagen and Aarhus, Denmark.
NCRR - National Centre for Register-based Research, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Addiction. 2020 Jul;115(7):1368-1377. doi: 10.1111/add.14910. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
Population-based cohort study SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: ADHD cases in the iPSYCH sample (a Danish case-cohort sample of genotyped cases with specific mental disorders), born in Denmark between 1981 and 2003 (N = 13 116). Register-based information on hospital diagnoses of SUD was available until December 31, 2016.
We estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for any SUD as well as for different SUD types (alcohol, cannabis, and other illicit drugs) and severities (use, abuse, and addiction), with effect sizes corresponding to a comparison of the highest PRS-ADHD decile to the lowest.
PRS-ADHD were associated with any SUD (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11-1.51). Estimates were similar across different types and severity levels of SUD. Other risk factors for SUD (male sex, age at ADHD diagnosis, comorbid conduct problems, and parental factors including SUD, mental disorders, and socio-economic status) were independently associated with increased risk of SUD. PRS-ADHD explained a minor proportion of the variance in SUD (0.2% on the liability scale) compared to the other risk factors. The association between PRS-ADHD and any SUD was slightly attenuated (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.41) after adjusting for the other risk factors for SUD. Furthermore, associations were nominally higher in females than in males (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.19-2.12, OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.98-1.42).
A higher genetic liability to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder appears to be associated with higher risks of substance use disorders in individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
1)探讨注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的遗传易感性(以 ADHD 的多基因风险评分 [PRS-ADHD] 为指标)是否与 ADHD 个体的物质使用障碍(SUD)相关。2)探讨其他个体或家庭相关的 SUD 风险因素是否可以中介或混淆这种关联。
基于人群的队列研究
iPSYCH 样本中的 ADHD 病例(丹麦特定精神障碍基因分型病例的病例-队列样本),于 1981 年至 2003 年期间在丹麦出生(N=13116)。截至 2016 年 12 月 31 日,可获得基于登记的 SUD 住院诊断信息。
我们使用 95%置信区间(CI)估计了任何 SUD 以及不同 SUD 类型(酒精、大麻和其他非法药物)和严重程度(使用、滥用和成瘾)的比值比(OR),其效应大小与最高 PRS-ADHD 十分位数与最低十分位数的比较相对应。
PRS-ADHD 与任何 SUD(OR=1.30,95%CI:1.11-1.51)相关。在不同类型和严重程度的 SUD 中,估计值相似。SUD 的其他风险因素(男性、ADHD 诊断时的年龄、合并的品行问题以及包括 SUD、精神障碍和社会经济地位在内的父母因素)与 SUD 风险增加独立相关。PRS-ADHD 仅解释了 SUD 变异的一小部分( Liability 量表上为 0.2%),而其他 SUD 风险因素则解释了大部分变异。在调整了 SUD 的其他风险因素后,PRS-ADHD 与任何 SUD 的关联略有减弱(OR=1.21,95%CI:1.03-1.41)。此外,与男性相比,女性的关联在名义上更高(OR=1.59,95%CI:1.19-2.12,OR=1.18,95%CI:0.98-1.42)。
更高的 ADHD 遗传易感性似乎与 ADHD 个体的物质使用障碍风险增加相关。